Entries in the '' Category

Danish embassy staff removed after ‘imminent’ threat

Copenhagen | April 24, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23590611-38200,00.html

DENMARK has moved staff from its embassies in Algeria and Afghanistan to secret safe locations because of an imminent threat, Foreign Ministry officials say.

The threats were “so concrete” action had to be taken, said Foreign Ministry spokesman Erik Laursen.

They are believed to be related to the republication of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed wearing a bomb in his turban. It was one of 12 drawings of the Prophet that sparked riots in the Muslim world in 2006 after originally being printed in a Danish newspaper in 2005.

Embassy employees in Algiers were relocated a few days ago, while those in Kabul were moved on Wednesday. They continue to work remotely, Mr Laursen said.

The Danish Security and Intelligence Service earlier this month warned of an aggravated terror threat level against Danish interests in North Africa, the Middle East, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It said the threat level had sharpened since Danish newspapers reprinted earlier this year a cartoon depicting the Prophet Mohammed as a protest over a plot to murder the cartoonist.

In an audio recording posted on a militant website on March 19, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden warned of a “severe” reaction against Europe over the reprinting of the cartoon.

“There was a change in the security situation and we decided that it was necessary due to the situation locally,” Mr Laursen said.

He said the decision was based on new intelligence, but did not elaborate.

It is not known how long staff will remain at their new locations.

Foreign Minister Per Stig Moeller said staff at other Danish embassies could also be relocated in light of the bin Laden warning.

“There has been a general threat from al-Qaeda which means that their cells or people who sympathise with them around the world will try to see where they can fulfill al-Qaeda’s desires,” Mr Moeller said.

“Therefore I can certainly not say that they are the last two embassies (to be evacuated).”

AFP

A Complaint to the Police Complaints Authority

TO THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY



COMPLAINANT
Cailen Cambeul
POSTAL ADDRESS: PO Box 420, Oaklands Park, 5046
Telephone No: 61 88*****88

POLICE OFFICERS INVOLVED
NAME: Minchenberg
STATION: E-Crime/Major Crime
RANK: DSC
IN UNIFORM?: No
AGE (APPROX): Over 40
DESCRIPTION & APPEARANCE: Approx 5ft 8in & obese

WHEN DID IT HAPPEN?
Date: 29 March 2006
Time: 08:00 am
WHERE DID IT HAPPEN?
Town or Suburb: Reynella
Street: Hutchinson Ave
House No: Flat 2, No. 8
Nearest Cross Street: Main South Road

THE COMPLAINT
The officer in question (along with approximately nine other officers) acted without authority in seizing two Personal Computers, Federal Tax Documents and a USB Memory Device.

Further: According to the booklet “Welcome to South Australia” by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship, police “do not play a part in politics.” As I disagree with many of the policies of the state government, I describe myself as a Political Dissenter. Seizure of property for political dissention appears to be the case in this instance as the officer in question does not approve of my dissent.

I have also been informed by a former police officer that Detective Senior Constable Minchenberg maybe Jewish, and if so, his actions may have been racially motivated -Which in itself is a breach of the SA Racial Vilification Act.

Finally: No criminal or civil charges were ever made against me. All items were returned in January of this year – Almost two years after the fact.

SIGNED: . .C.Cambeul. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date: .14 April.08 . .


And the Response

FROM THE POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY




22 April 2008

Mr Cailen Cambeul
PO Box 420
OAKLANDS PARK SA 5046

Dear Mr Cailen Cambeul

I refer to your complaint made to the Police Complaints Authority on 14 April 2008 about the seizure of computer equipment in 2006.

Having considered your complaint, I have made a determination under Section 21(1)(a) of the Police (Complaints and Disciplinary Proceedings) Act 1985, that your complaint not be referred for investigation on the basis that the matters about which you complain occurred over six (6) months ago, and I see no special reasons to justify such an investigation.

Your faithfully,

Wayne Mackay
Delegate of
Anthony D Wainwright

Police Complaints Authority


Bearing in mind that I did make several complaints to different departments of the state legal apparatus (including the Law Society, Ombudsmen and the PCA), where I was told to put my complaint in writing after the investigation was complete. To which I replied that I was only too happy to do so. Well, I did as I was advised and you have seen what following the mind numbing methods of the system has brought about.

My advice to my fellow White Political Dissidents reading this is: Do as the Abos, Lebos, Jews and others do. When the police target you for harresment because of your political beliefs, mode of dress or racial outlook, make an immediate complaint to your local Police Complaints Authority. If they try to get you on a crime that you know you are innocent of, make a complaint. Don’t wait to fight it in court (if you ever get there), make that complaint. It is your “Democratic” right.

That is the the main reason Abos and the rest are left alone by the police. Abos create too much paperwork and the police are forced to justify not only every action they took, but also every word and every thought – the very reasoning behind that action.

White Political Dissidents have for too long been easy targets of the system because even if we didn’t consciously believe it, we unconsciously believed that the system was fair and that any bad apples will be sorted out … eventually. That’s not the way it is and we all know it.

So, when the police or petty government officals harass you, make your complaints to your local Complaints Authority and make them fear you the way they fear Abos.

You do have a right to be White.

Stay proud.
Cailen

Police Complaints Authority Website
Police Complaints Authority Complaint Form (PDF)

Feminism & Multiculturalism = Twin Evils of Marxist Social Engineering for Social Revolution

“Women’s power is difficult to see and measure. But we better get a grip on it. As long as women can pretend they don’t have any power, we can’t call them on how they use – and misuse – it. And they get to keep what they have all to themselves.”
If Men Have All The POWER – How Come Women Make The RULES?

It’s just typical of society that the author of the above quote/book (although I do thoroughly recommend it as an excellent read) not only fails to realise the correlation between sexism and racism, but also denies it. Prejudice comes in all forms and no matter what you call it, it is still discrimination.

Being White and an heterosexual male I have been and continue to be a victim of racial and sexual discrimination. I have learned that any heterosexual male who happens to be in competition with a female in any civil or legal situation will most likely come off second best. The same goes for any so-called minority. Heterosexual versus homosexual. White people versus black/brown/yellow/red.

One hundred years ago, the situation was different. We would have just shoved pitchforks up their arses. Something the homosexuals would probably have enjoyed. But a hundred years ago political correctness had not yet come to dominate our society and culture.

In The Historical Roots of Political Correctness, Raymond V. Raehn explains it thus:

“In 1924, as a result of a meeting the year before attended by Georg Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany, there came to be founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. This Institute became known as the Frankfurt School. Its model was the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The members of this Institute prepared numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they assumed led to the rise of German national socialism. These were critical studies that combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis. The sum of these critical studies became known as Frankfurt School “Critical Theory.”

“Frankfurt School Critical Theory was essentially destructive criticism of the main elements of Western culture such as Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalties, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism….

“Frankfurt School Critical Theory encompasses a group of specific sub-theories such as matriarchal theory, androgyny theory, personality theory, prejudice theory, authority theory, family theory, sexuality theory, racial theory, legal theory and literary theory. These various sub-theories are used to induce an inversion of the prevailing belief system so the Marxist revolutionaries can engineer a non-violent social revolution.

“As the Marxist social revolutionaries readily proclaim among themselves, their avowed purpose is to DESTROY THE HEGEMONIC WHITE MALE STRUCTURE OF POWER. This requires the inversion of beliefs of white males so that they feel impelled to relinquish their positions to women and minorities. This reflects the psycho-dynamics of social revolution that lies at the core of Political Correctness.”

You might think that it ended there and National Socialist Germany put a stop to the Frankfurt School “Critical Theory,” but you would be wrong. Being good little Marxists, they fled the “Nazi tyrant” choosing to settle in the very place they were planning to destroy with their social revolution, the United States of America. There they were welcomed by the Internalist Elite of that country and installed in its universities to begin the work of perverting America’s youth. This form of social revolution (after spreading to other nations) came to a head in the sixties with the youth becoming the foot-soldiers of Marx. i.e. Feminists, civil rights, sexual liberation/moral perversion, the drug culture, the counter culture, ad nauseum. Fastforward thirty years and the moral reprebates of yesteryear now run the system. There is much more to the article, but that is the essence of it.

Multiculturalism is the new religion and together with its preacher, political correctness, it has turned society on its head. Not – as is thought by the gullible – for the purposes of the betterment of humanity, but for the purposes of a Marxist take over. And just as in Marxist dictatorships, anyone or any group that speaks out against the new regime is determined to be a thought-criminal.

The Internationalist Elite at work again.

So let us rephrase the opening quote to this blog entry.

Minority power is difficult to see and measure. But we better get a grip on it. As long as minorities can pretend they don’t have any power, we can’t call them on how they use – and misuse – it. And they get to keep what they have all to themselves.

Cailen

Jewish Groups Applaud Annihilation of Freedom of Speech

ADC applauds proposed web blackout for hate groups

Peter Kohn: Australian Jewish News | April 14, 2008

http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=5253

CIVIL liberties arguments do not apply when extremist organisations use the internet to spread hatred, B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) chair John Searle said last week.

“Clearly a line has to be drawn between freedom of speech, voicing of differing opinions – and material that just incites racial hatred, religious intolerance and violence. When that line is crossed, that material ought not to be freely available to all who log onto the web.”

Searle was responding to protests voiced by civil libertarians after a recent conference of state and federal attorneys-general proposed cutting off Australian internet access to hate groups.

State and federal attorneys-general met in Adelaide late last month to canvass options for empowering the Australian Communications and Media Authority to order internet service providers to cease hosting racist and anti-Semitic websites.

The ADC has joined groups from other com-munities welcoming the proposal.

Searle said the ban, if it receives the go-ahead, will not stop underground distribution, but will remove a heavily accessed outlet for groups to disseminate their message.

The ADC drew attention to virulent anti-Semitic material hosted by the Australian website, Mission Islam.

Material promoted by Mission Islam include The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, as well as an article that accuses Jews of infiltrating the United States administration, and another claiming Jews “like to spread mischief and corruption”.

Members of the ADC last week met with Parliamentary Secretary for Multicultural Affairs Laurie Ferguson to discuss the material disseminated by Mission Islam and other extremist organisations on the web.

Searle previously said state governments and the former federal government had resisted calls by the ADC to ban these sites.

“We have laws banning race hatred and we have laws policing certain kinds of violent and pornographic material on the internet, but we have no system to police race hatred on the internet. It’s inconsistent and leads to the abuse of minorities,” he said.

Meanwhile, the ADC has appointed Deborah Stone as its new research director.

Searle said the organisation had not had a person in the role for some months, since the departure of Melinda Jones.

He said Stone, a former AJN editor, “has an excellent knowledge of the community and of the issues the ADC faces”.


Comment:
I’d be willing to bet that sites such  as The Australian Jewish News will continue their hatred of all things that are not obscenely pro-Israel.

Cailen.

Law chiefs plan ban on race-hate sites

Imre Salusinszky, NSW political reporter: The Australian | April 01, 2008

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23464021-5013945,00.html

RACE-HATE websites could be banned under an internet censorship proposal being considered by state and federal attorneys-general.

The plan, which is in its early stages, has aroused concern among civil libertarians who fear it could be used to stifle political debate.

The attorneys-general, meeting in Adelaide last week, commissioned a report on the viability of authorising the Australian Communications and Media Authority to combat race-hate sites by ordering internet service providers to take them down.

At present, ACMA polices websites that breach copyright, promote terrorism or publish extreme pornography.

“There are racial vilification laws, but the problem with the internet is you can’t trace down the people,” NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said yesterday.

“Any material that incites vilification and hatred is of concern. Material on the internet is a particular concern because it provides a cheap and easy means of dissemination to a very wide audience.”

The proposal, which would be open for public consultation before any decision was made, followed a referral to the attorneys by state and federal police ministers, Mr Hatzistergos said. Concerns had also been expressed by non-English-speaking groups about comments on white-supremacist websites.

For the ACMA to be able to take down sites, it would require a new definition of the “refused classification” category used by the federal Government’s Classification Board to deal with violent pornography and similar material. The proposed system could affect websites such as the one operated by the Australia First party, which was involved in the civil unrest at Cronulla in December 2005.

An article on the group’s website, signed by “Joni”, compares Muslims to mould. “You have the innocent, healthy, cheese block sitting in your fridge minding its own business til one day you peel back the wrapper to see a tiny section of mould on the surface,” she writes.

“Just when you think it’s safe to appreciate your cheese in your own environment again you see it’s back. Now darker, deeper, growing, invading, insidious.”

But Dale Clapperton, from the online civil liberties group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said a problem with banning such sites was that “it inevitably turns them into martyrs and gives more attention to the type of material you are trying to suppress”.

“The best cure for ‘bad’ speech is more speech,” Mr Clapperton said.

Call to switch onus on racist offences

Carol Nader: The Age | April 5, 2008

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/call-to-switch-onus-on-racist-offences/2008/04/04/1207249461190.html

A STUDY of racial discrimination laws in several Western countries has prompted a call for the Government to toughen Australia’s 33-year-old laws.

Race Discrimination Commissioner Tom Calma wants the burden of proof in cases of racial discrimination to fall on the alleged offender, instead of the person making the complaint.

Mr Calma said Australia’s laws made it difficult to prove there had been discrimination.

A Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission analysis of other countries, including the US, Britain and Canada, shows that in those countries the onus of proof shifts to the person who has been accused of discrimination once the complainant has established an initial case.

In Australia, the burden of proof rests on the person making the complaint.

Mr Calma will ask the Federal Government to review the Race Discrimination Act, which was established in 1975 and was the first human rights legislation introduced in Australia. The only amendments to the act were the introduction of racial hatred provisions in 1995.

Mr Calma said some people who had been racially discriminated against did not lodge a complaint because they felt the process was too hard.

“It is a difficult exercise to be able to get that evidence together and if the offending party doesn’t want to co-operate then you can’t progress it,” he said. “We do get occasions where people don’t want to co-operate, and then we’re forced to terminate a case, and then the case might have to be taken forward to a court.” The alleged offender can be summoned to court to defend themselves, but then it gets very expensive.

A spokesman for Attorney-General Robert McClelland said the Race Discrimination Act had been a “strong and effective protection against racism”.

He said the Government had committed to conducting a wide-ranging national consultation on how to best protect the rights and responsibilities of Australians.

“The courts have not identified significant areas of deficiency or inconsistency in the operation and interpretation of the act, which could be resolved by amending the act,” he said. The Age believes that consultation could start by the end of the year.

The nation’s attorneys-general have also agreed to examine options to make Commonwealth and state anti-discrimination laws more consistent.

Mr Calma said if people were forced to defend themselves, it might make them think twice before offending.

These kinds of complaints were usually a last resort. “A lot of people will tolerate behaviour, consider it a joke, until it comes to crunch point,” he said. “You don’t get vexatious complaints for the sake of complaints.”

Peter van Vliet, executive officer of the Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria, said Australia’s racial discrimination laws needed to be strengthened.

“There is a serious power imbalance, particularly between larger organisations and individuals who are being discriminated against,” he said.

“We certainly have a large body of anecdotal evidence that systemic racial and religious discrimination, particularly with regards to employment, exists in Australia.”