Entries in the '' Category

Asian thief dishonestly claims lost wallet at Westfield

The Advertiser | May 27, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23758008-2682,00.html

AN opportunist thief has taken advantage of the honesty of a good samaritan by claiming ownership of a lost wallet filled with cash.

The wallet was found in a cinema on Friday, May 16, at the end of a movie screening at Marion Megaplex, Westfield Marion.

Police said a person found the lost wallet and asked a nearby couple if it belonged to them.

When they said no, another man claimed the wallet was his and it was handed over in good faith.

But it was later revealed that the wallet did not belong to the man or his female companion, both photographed leaving the cinema by security cameras.

They are first seen on the escalators and then both going into toilets near the Cassurina restaurant.

The male suspect appears to be of Asian appearance and has short black hair and glasses and the female, also Asian, is of slim build with straight, dyed blonde hair.

Anyone with any information about the theft should call BankSA Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

Purse snatched by aboriginal attacker

The Advertiser | May 27, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23758870-2682,00.html

A WOMAN had her purse taken in an attack by another woman on Franklin St in the city this morning.

The victim was not hurt when assaulted just before 10am.

The offender was described as of Aboriginal appearance, about 152cm tall, stocky build and grey hair.

Anybody with information is asked to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

Prejudice

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice

Definition
The word prejudice refers to prejudgment: making a decision before becoming aware of the relevant facts of a case or event. The word has commonly been used in certain restricted contexts, in the expression ‘racial prejudice’. Initially this referred to making a judgment about a person based on their race, before receiving information relevant to the particular issue on which a judgment was being made; it came, however, to be widely used to refer to any hostile attitude towards people based on their race. Subsequently the word has come to be widely so interpreted in this way in contexts other than those relating to race. The meaning now is frequently “any unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to rational influence”. Race, gender, ethnic, sexual identity, age, and religion have a history of inciting prejudicial behavior.

Monty Python’s Prejudice

John Cleese Explains

Everybody’s a Little Bit Racist

Bikers Fight Back Against SA’s Draconian Laws

Bikie gangs form fund to mount High Court challenge

Colin James, Legal Affairs Editor: The Advertiser | May 22, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23744533-5006301,00.html

MAJOR bikie gangs have formed a fighting fund to mount a High Court challenge against controversial laws aimed at driving them out of the state.

The Hells Angels, Finks, Rebels and Gypsy Jokers have told their lawyers – including several Queen’s Counsel – to join to overturn the laws, passed by State Parliament despite widespread criticism from lawyers and civil libertarians.

The Advertiser has confirmed the gangs have begun raising funds to ensure the country’s best constitutional experts can fight the laws in the High Court of Australia once all other legal avenues have been exhausted.

The bikie gangs also have discussed holding a mass protest by jointly riding hundreds of motorcycles into Victoria Square while State Cabinet is sitting inside the State Administration Building on a Monday morning.

The developments come as the SA Police Crime Gang Task Force prepares to use the Serious and Organised Crime (Control) Bill to directly attack the leadership of the state’s eight bikie gangs, with special attention on such office holders as presidents and treasurers.

Task force officers this week underwent special training on how to enforce the laws, which enable police to obtain restraining orders to stop bikies from associating with each other or anyone with criminal records.

Police Commissioner Mal Hyde can apply to Attorney-General Michael Atkinson to have bikie gangs declared illegal, with courts empowered to issue restraining orders on individual members.

Legal sources yesterday confirmed several bikie gangs had decided to mount a united challenge against the laws, which were modelled on the Federal Government’s anti-terrorism legislation.

Prominent criminal defence lawyer Craig Caldicott said the challenge would be based on a test case to be identified once the laws came into effect in the next few months.

“There are people putting together funds for the purpose of going to the High Court,” he said.

“The laws are draconian and there’s no doubt they’re going to give rise to challenges at all levels inside the court system.”

Mr Caldicott, who represents several well-known bikies, said lawyers were particularly concerned decisions made by magistrates and judges under the laws could not be the subject of judicial review.

David Edwardson QC, one of the top criminal barristers in the state, believed it was “appropriate that bikie gangs had formed a fighting fund to challenge the laws because they were flawed and lacked transparency in a number of material respects.”

“It is a great concern to me, at least, that there is no way of challenging a decision made by the commissioner of police or the Attorney-General under these laws,” he said.

“And, while today they are saying it is confined to bikies, what is saying that it will not be the BLF (Builders Labourers Federation) tomorrow.”

The Democrats and Greens unsuccessfully attempted to have the laws opened to judicial review – where judges could independently assess decisions – during a lengthy debate this month in the Legislative Council. The State Opposition supported the Government in blocking the move, agreeing it would enable lawyers to launch legal challenges in the state’s courts.

Police Minister Paul Holloway last night said: “To allow judicial review or legal challenges to declarations, control and public safety orders created by the new laws would have undermined the operation of the State Government’s anti-bikie legislation.”

He said members of organised criminal groups were well funded and had access to the best legal advice and representation. The new laws were expected to be effective from late July or early August.


This is a change, they actually posted the comment I left.

Comment:
Don’t kid yourselves that these so-called “anti-bikie laws” are designed just to target the “bikie gangs.” They are designed to be used on anybody that the state police and government choose to target. Their lauded anti-fortress law which was supposedly only put in place to target the outlaw motorcycle clubs’ club houses can be used against you if you have a high fence with a lockable gate surrounding your home. Under the law, if you deliberately make it difficult for just one policeman to enter your home, you may be charged under the anti-fortress laws. Similarly with the new law that supposedly gives police the power to order a club member to take his colours off isn’t limited to outlaw motorcycle club members. The law will allow police to give orders and press charges on clothing that they “deem” to be unsuitable for society. And now they give the police and Attorney General the oportunity to declare illegal any motorcycle club that they choose. Again this will be a law on the books that will allow the state police and government to target any group they wish to persecute and declare illegal.

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide

Lawyer says bikie gangs will fight SA laws

ABC | May 23, 2008

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/05/23/2253504.htm?section=justin

A barrister says bikie gangs are uniting to challenge the South Australian Government’s anti-gangs legislation.

New laws to take effect from July will let authorities restrict association and declare gangs illegal.

Barrister Craig Caldicott says groups are putting aside differences and plan to fund a High Court challenge.

“A number of the groups are talking,” he said.

“You must bear in mind that not just bikies but it’s any group that the Attorney-General and the Commissioner of Police target.

“Probably (Premier) Mr Rann and (Attorney-General) Mr Atkinson have done better to unite the groups than any other force in the state.”

Audio: Lawyer Craig Caldicott tells 891’s David Bevan that bikie gangs may unite in a High Court test case. (ABC News)

Winning the Cultural War

Charlton Heston | February 16, 1999

From his “Winning the Cultural War” speech given at the Harvard Law School Forum.

“I remember my son when he was 5, explaining to his kindergarten class what his father did for a living. “My Daddy,” he said, “pretends to be people.” There have been quite a few of them. Prophets from the Old and New Testaments, a couple of Christian saints, generals of various nationalities and different centuries, several kings, three American presidents, a French cardinal and two geniuses, including Michelangelo.

“If you want the ceiling re-painted I’ll do my best. There always seem to be a lot of different fellows up here. I’m never sure which one of them gets to talk. Right now, I guess I’m the guy.

“As I pondered our visit tonight it struck me: if my Creator gave me the gift to connect you with the hearts and minds of those great men, then I want to use that same gift now to re-connect you with your own sense of liberty … your own freedom of thought … your own compass for what is right.

“Dedicating the memorial at Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln said of America, “We are now engaged in a great Civil War, testing whether this nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.”

“Those words are true again. I believe that we are again engaged in a great civil war, a cultural war that’s about to hijack your birthright to think and say what resides in your heart. I fear you no longer trust the pulsing lifeblood of liberty inside you … the stuff that made this country rise from wilderness into the miracle that it is. Let me back up. About a year ago I became president of the National Rifle Association, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. I ran for office, I was elected, and now I serve … I serve as a moving target for the media who’ve called me everything from “ridiculous” and “duped” to a “brain-injured, senile, crazy old man.” I know … I’m pretty old … but I sure thank the Lord ain’t senile. As I have stood in the crosshairs of those who target Second Amendment freedoms, I’ve realized that firearms are not the only issue. No, it’s much, much bigger than that. I’ve come to understand that a cultural war is raging across our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, certain acceptable thoughts and speech are mandated.

“For example, I marched for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 — long before Hollywood found it fashionable. But when I told an audience last year that white pride is just as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone else’s pride, they called me a racist.

I’ve worked with brilliantly talented homosexuals all my life. But when I told an audience that gay rights should extend no further than your rights or my rights, I was called a homophobe.

“I served in World War II against the Axis powers. But during a speech, when I drew an analogy between singling out innocent Jews and singling out innocent gun owners, I was called an anti-Semite.

“Everyone I know knows I would never raise a closed fist against my country. But when I asked an audience to oppose this cultural persecution, I was compared to Timothy McVeigh.

“From Time magazine to friends and colleagues, they’re essentially saying, “Chuck, how dare you speak your mind. You are using language not authorized for public consumption!”

“But I am not afraid. If Americans believed in political correctness, we’d still be King George’s boys-subjects bound to the British crown.

“In his book, “The End of Sanity,” Martin Gross writes that “blatantly irrational behavior is rapidly being established as the norm in almost every area of human endeavor. There seem to be new customs, new rules, new anti-intellectual theories regularly foisted on us from every direction. Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something, without a name is undermining the nation, turning the mind mushy when it comes to separating truth from falsehood and right from wrong. And they don’t like it.”

“Let me read a few examples. At Antioch college in Ohio, young men seeking intimacy with a coed must get verbal permission at each step of the process from kissing to petting to final copulation … all clearly spelled out in a printed college directive.

“In New Jersey, despite the death of several patients nationwide who had been infected by dentists who had concealed their AIDS — the state commissioner announced that health providers who are HIV-positive need not. .. need not … tell their patients that they are infected.

“At William and Mary, students tried to change the name of the school team “The Tribe” because it was supposedly insulting to local Indians, only to learn that authentic Virginia chiefs truly like the name.

“In San Francisco, city fathers passed an ordinance protecting the rights of transvestites to cross-dress on the job, and for transsexuals to have separate toilet facilities while undergoing sex change surgery.

“In New York City, kids who don’t speak a word of Spanish have been placed in bilingual classes to learn their three R’s in Spanish solely because their last names sound Hispanic.

“At the University of Pennsylvania, in a state where thousands died at Gettysburg opposing slavery, the president of that college officially set up segregated dormitory space for black students.

“Yeah, I know … that’s out of bounds now. Dr. King said “Negroes.” Jimmy Baldwin and most of us on the March said “black.” But it’s a no-no now.

“For me, hyphenated identities are awkward … particularly “Native-American.” I’m a Native American, for God’s sake. I also happen to be a blood-initiated brother of the Miniconjou Sioux. On my wife’s side, my grandson is a 13th-generation Native American … with a capital letter on “American.”

“Finally, just last month … David Howard, head of the Washington D.C. Office of Public Advocate, used the word “niggardly” while talking to colleagues about budgetary matters. Of course, ‘niggardly’ means stingy or scanty. But within days Howard was forced to publicly apologize and resign.

“As columnist Tony Snow wrote: “David Howard got fired because some people in public employ were morons who (a) didn’t know the meaning of ‘niggardly,’ (b) didn’t know how to use a dictionary to discover the meaning, and (c) actually demanded that he apologize for their ignorance.”

“What does all of this mean? It means that telling us what to think has evolved into telling us what to say, so telling us what to do can’t be far behind. Before you claim to be a champion of free thought, tell me: Why did political correctness originate on America’s campuses? And why do you continue to tolerate it? Why do you, who’re supposed to debate ideas, surrender to their suppression?

“Let’s be honest. Who here thinks your professors can say what they really believe? It scares me to death, and should scare you too, that the superstition of political correctness rules the halls of reason.

“You are the best and the brightest. You, here in the fertile cradle of American academia, here in the castle of learning on the Charles River, you are the cream. But I submit that you, and your counterparts across the land, are the most socially conformed and politically silenced generation since Concord Bridge.

“And as long as you validate that … and abide it … you are-by your grandfathers’ standards-cowards. Here’s another example. Right now at more than one major university, Second Amendment scholars and researchers are being told to shut up about their findings or they’ll lose their jobs. Why? Because their research findings would undermine big-city mayor’s pending lawsuits that seek to extort hundreds of millions of dollars from firearm manufacturers.

“I don’t care what you think about guns. But if you are not shocked at that, I am shocked at you. Who will guard the raw material of unfettered ideas, if not you? Who will defend the core value of academia, if you supposed soldiers of free thought and expression lay down your arms and plead, “Don’t shoot me.”

“If you talk about race, it does not make you a racist. If you see distinctions between the genders, it does not make you a sexist. If you think critically about a denomination, it does not make you anti-religion. If you accept but don’t celebrate homosexuality, it does not make you a homophobe.

“Don’t let America’s universities continue to serve as incubators for this rampant epidemic of new McCarthyism. But what can you do? How can anyone prevail against such pervasive social subjugation?

“The answer’s been here all along. I learned it 36 years ago, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C., standing with Dr. Martin Luther King and two hundred thousand people.

“You simply … disobey. Peaceably, yes. Respectfully, of course. Nonviolently, absolutely. But when told how to think or what to say or how to behave, we don’t. We disobey social protocol that stifles and stigmatizes personal freedom.

“I learned the awesome power of disobedience from Dr. King … who learned it from Gandhi, and Thoreau and Jesus and every other great man who led those in the right against those with the might.

“Disobedience is in our DNA. We feel innate kinship with that Disobedient spirit that tossed tea into Boston Harbor, that sent Thoreau to jail, that refused to sit in the back of the bus, that protested a war in Vietnam.

“In that same spirit, I am asking you to disavow cultural correctness with massive disobedience of rogue authority, social directives and onerous law that weaken personal freedom.

“But be careful … it hurts. Disobedience demands that you put yourself at risk. Dr. King stood on lots of balconies. You must be willing to be humiliated … to endure the modern-day equivalent of the police dogs at Montgomery and the water Cannons at Selma. You must be willing to experience discomfort. I’m not Complaining, but my own decades of social activism have taken their toll on me. Let me tell you a story.

“A few years back I heard about a rapper named Ice-T who was selling a CD called “Cop Killer” celebrating ambushing and murdering police officers. It was being marketed by none other than Time/Warner, the biggest entertainment conglomerate in the world. Police across the country were outraged. Rightfully so-at least one had been murdered. But Time/Warner was stonewalling because the CD was a cash cow for them, and the media were tiptoeing around it because the rapper was black. I heard Time/Warner had a stockholders meeting scheduled in Beverly Hills. I owned some shares at the time, so I decided to attend.

“What I did there was against the advice of my family and colleagues. I asked for the floor. To a hushed room of a thousand average American stockholders, I simply read the full lyrics of “Cop Killer” — every vicious, vulgar, instructional word.”

“I GOT MY 12 GAUGE SAWED OFF
I GOT MY HEADLIGHTS TURNED OFF
I’m ABOUT TO BUST SOME SHOTS OFF
I’m ABOUT TO DUST SOME COPS OFF…”

“It got worse, a lot worse. I won’t read the rest of it to you. But trust me, the room was a sea of shocked, frozen, blanched faces. The Time/Warner executives squirmed in their chairs and stared at their shoes. They hated me for that. Then I delivered another volley of sick lyric brimming with racist filth, where Ice-T fantasizes about sodomizing two 12-year old nieces of Al and Tipper Gore. “SHE PUSHED HER BUTT AGAINST MY ….”

“Well, I won’t do to you here what I did to them. Let’s just say I left the room in echoing silence. When I read the lyrics to the waiting press corps, one of them said “We can’t print that.” “I know,” I replied, “but Time/Warner’s selling it.”

“Two months later, Time/Warner terminated Ice-T’s contract. I’ll never be offered another film by Warners, or get a good review from Time magazine. But disobedience means you must be willing to act, not just talk.

“When a mugger sues his elderly victim for defending herself … jam the switchboard of the district attorney’s office. When your university is pressured to lower standards until 80 percent of the students graduate with honors … choke the halls of the board of regents. When an 8-year-old boy pecks a girl’s cheek on the playground and gets hauled into court for sexual harassment … march on that school and block its doorways. When someone you elected is seduced by political power and betrays you … petition them, oust them, banish them. When Time magazine’s cover portrays millennium nuts as deranged, crazy Christians holding a cross as it did last month … boycott their magazine and the products it advertises.

“So that this nation may long endure, I urge you to follow in the hallowed footsteps of the great disobediences of history that freed exiles, founded religions, defeated tyrants, and yes, in the hands of an aroused rabble in arms and a few great men, by God’s grace, built this country.

“If Dr. King were here, I think he would agree.

“Thank you.”

Charlton Heston


Comment:
Ignoring Mr Heston’s spook in the sky stuff, the only part I disagree with is his parting comment of, “If Dr. King were here, I think he would agree.”

We have always known that King was a sharleton. A communist agitator that talked of peace and the brotherhood of man while stage-managing race riots wherever he went on his tour of lies and deception.

King was unabashedly on the side of those that Charlton Heston chose to oppose later in his life. Ol’ Baboon Mouth only spouted his brotherhood claptrap to win White people over to his side to have Whites working for the welfare of Blacks. If he’d lived, we would have eventually seen the other side of King rise to the surface and join his compatriots in the attack of everything that they see as White and we see as good.

If Dr. King were here, I think he would agree.

Cailen

Australia’s Internet Censorship – Thanks a Bloody Lot Chairman Krudd

Internet ‘clean feed’ useless – group

News.com.au | May 15, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23703848-421,00.html

THE Australian public is being urged to reject the Federal Government’s plan to censor the internet.

Online advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) says the Government’s decision to fund its mandatory “clean feed” internet in the 2008-09 Federal Budget is a waste of taxpayers money.

“At a time when the Government is cutting services to fight inflation, it’s bewildering that they would decide to spend tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on a filter before feasibility trials are even complete,” EFA spokesman Colin Jacobs said.

“Given the manifest impracticality of the clean feed scheme, I’m sure this money could have been put to much better use.”

The Budget allocates $24.3 million to the Government’s “cyber-safety” initiative, rising to $51.4 million in the 2009-10 financial year.

Some of the funding will come from the now-defunct NetAlert filter scheme, which provided free internet filters to all Australian homes.

“Funding will be redirected to support internet service providers (ISP) making available a filtered internet service, or clean feed, to all homes, schools and public internet points accessible to children,” Federal Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said.

The EFA said most Australians were unhappy with the Government’s decision to filter internet content at the ISP level.

“Australians are very uncomfortable with the idea of having the Government decide what’s appropriate for them and their families,” Mr Jacobs said.

“In fact, in a survey of 18,000 internet users, only 13 per cent agreed with the policy.

“That’s why we feel it is a shame, when the Government has identified real needs for better education and policing, that their approach to internet policy is so skewed towards the filter initiative.”

EFA has launched a website to highlight its concerns at http://nocleanfeed.com


Comment:
Something they failed to mention was that censorship of this kind will bring us closer than ever to our traitor of a Prime Minister’s friends in China. That along with the enforced learning of Cantonese and/or Mandarin for all school children should make Chairman Krudd happy.

I didn’t like (or vote) for Howard either, but by comparison, Krudd’s allies and their methods of enforced and self censorship make Howard’s rule look like a time of almost complete freedom.

Cailen

The Goodies – South Africa

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa_(Goodies_episode)

Synopsis
South Africa is an episode of the British comedy television series The Goodies.
This episode is also known as “Apartheight” and as “A South African Adventure”.

The Goodies make an advertisement for South Africa. However, the South African Tourist Agent is unhappy with what they have done.

The enraged agent forces the Goodies to emigrate to South Africa, where the old segregation of apartheid is replaced by the new segregation of apartheight (apart-height). Tim and Graeme are tall enough not to be affected — but Bill is not quite tall enough. Bill, and the South African jockeys, are now treated as the new niggers of South Africa, and are put under curfew.

Quote
South African Tourism Agent: “You make it look as though South Africa is full of black people having a good time!”
Tim: “Well, it is full of black people!”
South African Tourism Agent: “But they’re not having a good time!”

Note
Possibly the most controversial of all The Goodies episodes, South Africa has only been shown once on BBC2 (and to the best of my knowledge, never in Australia – Cailen). The BBC apparently disliked the team dipping into serious social satire, and tried to stop the programme from being broadcast completely.

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Draconian Laws to ‘Squash’ Bikers & Everyone Else Along With Them

Law passed to ’squash’ bikies

Joanna Vaughan, Political Reporter: The Advertiser | May 08, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23662466-2682,00.html

POLICE soon will have the power to “squash” bikie gangs and force them to move elsewhere after the Government’s controversial anti-bikie legislation passed through Parliament last night.
Police Minister Paul Holloway said SA was on the verge of having the nation’s and perhaps the world’s toughest anti-bikie laws.

“These are the laws that police have asked for and, finally, we are able to ensure police have exactly what they need to take on these criminal bikie gangs,” he said.

When the laws are gazetted, it will be illegal for anyone to associate with known bikies six or more times a year.

Bikies also will be banned from specific locations.

The Serious and Organised Crime (Control) Bill 2007 also will enable Police Commissioner Mal Hyde to obtain orders from the Attorney-General, Michael Atkinson, declaring bikie gangs illegal.

The decision to outlaw bikie gangs comes three days after dozens of people were forced to dive for cover after 15 shots were fired from semi-automatic weapons on Gouger St in the city.

The Government “hoped” to have the laws in place by July 1. The legislation was criticised as draconian by other states at a March meeting of State and Federal Government ministers.

Greens MLC Mark Parnell and Democrats MLC Sandra Kanck, who between them introduced about 100 failed amendments to the Bill, had branded it “an abuse of police powers”.

Opposition police spokesman David Ridgway, however, said the Opposition supported the Bill because it gave police the powers to provide a safe community.

“We acknowledge that we do have problems within the community with motorcycle gangs,” he said.

“It is important to give the appropriate measures to police to crack down on these gangs and these recent shootings prove that something needs to be done.”

Mr Ridgway said the Bill established the value of the Legislative Council, which was made clear when the Government used it to make needed amendments. That came just hours after Deputy Premier Kevin Foley attacked the House, labelling it irrelevant, reckless and destructive.

“I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard the Government moving amendments to its own Bikies Bill because of errors in two clauses relating to the definition of family members and what regular association with members of a declared organisation entails,” Mr Ridgway said.

“All I can say to Mr Foley is this thank heavens for the Upper House and its powers of review because we are the ones who have fixed up your defective legislation.”

The legislation goes back to the Lower House for final approval this week.


Comment:
If you believe this law will only be used to attack the criminal element within the bike clubs, then you are as stupid and naive as any government could ever hope for you to be. This law is going to be used to hound everyone who rides a motorcycle, everyone who dresses a particular way and middle aged, heavy-set men with tattoos and beards who refuse to wear baggy pink boardshorts. i.e. Your father or grandfather.

One of the laws amongst many that they have developed is one giving police the power to charge anyone wearing clothing or items of clothing they “deem” not suitable for society.

“… it will be illegal for anyone to associate with known bikies ….” Who decides if someone is a “known bikie?” It doesn’t matter that the coppers and the government will make the original and legally binding decision, it is the rest of the gutless population of SA that will refuse to associate with anyone they deem to be a biker, just incase they are arrested for it.

“Bikies also will be banned from specific locations.” Again, this means that security in all venues from your local shopping centre to the Adelaide Casino can refuse to allow anyone they deem to be a biker from paying his bills, having a quiet beer, or for your grandfather to have a flutter on the pokies with your grandmother.

But you, the South Australian sheeple, who refuse to believe a single word of warning will remain that way until they come for you and your precious daddy. And by then, it will be too late.

Cailen

Abos Terrorise Family in Their Home

Family terrorised in their home

Michael Milnes, Police Reporter: The Advertiser | April 30, 2008

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23622428-2682,00.html

A NORTHEASTERN suburbs family was terrorised by four hooded men who broke into their house at 2.30am.

Early yesterday – as a man and woman were watching television while their children were asleep in bed – the four intruders broke into their house after forcing open a window.

One of the men, who was armed with a star dropper, ordered the couple to lie on the ground and then assaulted the man with the weapon.

The intruders demanded money and then ransacked the house, stealing money, jewellery and a mobile phone.

The victim was treated in hospital for facial injuries.

The offenders are all described as Aboriginal in appearance aged between 20-30 years, all were wearing hoods with material over their faces.

One of the men is described as having his upper teeth missing, anyone with information is asked to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.


Latest Comments:

Its becoming all too familiar isn’t it? Men of Aboriginal appearance, in car chase, home invasions, man robbed in carpark, robbery at ATM. Time to get tough Judges, they are obviously not getting the message. Of course i am going to be labelled a racist aren’t I? Never mind the victims lets feel sorry for the perpertrators.
Posted by: David of Adelaide

David of Adelaide, no you are not a racist. You are totally correct.
Posted by: Sarah

We are not safe in our own homes anymore! What is wrong with those people? We need more police on our streets. We need harsher penalties for these people. They simply don’t care about anything or anyone but themselves. Mr Rudd can I buy back my shotgun please? NOW?
Posted by: Luke

Hope the Police and judiciary takes some drastic measures quickly to end this menance before some innocent life is lost. If you are not safe inside your own house then what the city is coming to. The culprits don’t have any respect for human lives and they don’t should not come under any humanitarian considerations when they are dealt with.
Posted by: Graham Phillips of Adelaide

I think why this Government is not getting tougher on this type of criminal is because of political correctness, they are the “untouchables”!
Posted by: Mike P

David of Adelaide…well said mate! too much time is spent making excuses for why they committ the crime! its time that the judges and government put an end to this madness otherwise people will start taking the law into their own hands…
Posted by: ninja_turtle of null

Must be the Gang of 4 — oops, belonging to the gang of 49 — still 49 eh
Posted by: MAC of ADELAIDE

The government wants to build a new hospital. Build it, renovate the old one with bars on the windows for these thugs.
Posted by: Peter of SA

what they did is bad. but there PLENTY more of what happens, and much worse. anyway, the majority of you commenters are RACISTS! leave. just *** off.
Posted by: nic of adelaide

Refusing to do anything about out of control crime just because the perpetrators are aboriginal is racism in itself. The Minister for Multicultural Affairs & Attorney General, Michael Atkinson has a lot to answer for.
Posted by Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide
(Comment refused by The Advertiser)