Entries in the 'Federal Gov' Category

Australian Government Refugee Allowances vs. Australian Pensioners

I was sent this in an email. Can anyone confirm ANY of the details as true? Or is it the complete hoax I think it is?

FORWARD THIS TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS YOU CAN
AND VOICE YOUR DISGUST!!

THIS IS WRONG AND MUST BE STOPPED!!!!

Australian Government Refugee Allowances vs. Australian Pensioners

It is interesting that the Federal Government provides a Single Refugee with a monthly allowance of $1,890.00 And each can also get an additional $580. 00 in Social Assistance, so a total of $2,470.00 per month.. Family of 4 can receive $9,880.00 per month or yearly $118,685

A single Australian pensioner who, after contributing to the growth and development of Australia for 40 to 50 years, receives only a monthly maximum of $1,342.00 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement. (Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees!)

Let’s send this to all Australians so we can all be ticked off and maybe we can get the refugees cut back to $1,342.00 and the pensioners up to $2,470.00 and enjoy some of the money we are forced to submit to the Government in taxes.

Forward this to every Australian to expose what our elected politicians are doing to already over-taxed Australians

http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/docs/current/071002_hoax_email.pdf

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=centrelink+%22refugee+allowance%22&btnG=Google+Search&meta=&aq=null&oq=

It is my understanding that refugees coming to Australia receive a government grant which enables them to furnish a home, purchase clothing and a motor vehicle.

They are then placed on whatever Social Security/Centrelink benefit is the most appropriate for them – usually beginning with Special Benefits which are equal in income to Unemployment Benefits. Although, unlike the average Australian in receipt of Unemployment Benefits, refugees are under no obligation to supply fortnightly reports detailing at least thirty verifiable attempts to find gainful employment. However, the same arrangement more often than not, continues after refugees begin to receive the standard Unemployment Benefit.

In most cases, refugees that do find full time employment continue to receive Social Security/Centrelink benefits as a supplementary income to their weekly wage. The same applies to indigenous Australians.

Finally, the refugees are placed at the top of the list for public/government housing, effectively jumping the queue by twenty-five or more years (the amount of time it takes the average Australian to obtain public/government housing).

Is not the truth damning enough without the need for hoax emails to be passed around, making us all look like straw clutching, delusional xenophobes?

Forward THAT to every Australian to expose what our elected politicians are doing to already over-taxed Australians.

Cailen.

HREOC: The Truth is No Defence

Jones, 2GB ordered to pay Trad $10k

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/22/2778046.htm

The radio broadcaster Alan Jones and his employer 2GB have been ordered to pay $10,000 in damages and apologise to the Muslim leader Keysar Trad. …

The tribunal said the broadcasts included Mr Jones’ view that Australia is not a multi-racial but a mono-cultural society, and that this mono-culture was under threat from the “enemies within.”

Mr Jones spoke about “car hoons” – which he identified as “Lebanese Muslim youths” – and their disrespect for police.

The tribunal says Mr Jones also interpreted an allegedly inflammatory speech by a Lebanese-Australian cleric as an excuse for or incitement of sexual assaults by Muslim men upon non-Muslim women. …

The tribunal found that Mr Jones’ commentary, when taken as a whole, was unreasonable.

“Rather than dispassionately analysing the evidence and commenting on it, Mr Jones appears to have been induced or stimulated by his own preconceptions to place highly exaggerated and distorted interpretations on the few objective facts apparently known to him,” the ruling said.

“Sometimes you get the impression they don’t realise how much hurt and how much risk their comments create,” he said.

“They create risk of harassment, risk of physical abuse and risk of intimidation, risk of loss of jobs.”


Comment:
Yet when the media exaggerate and lie about adherents of the one and only White racial religion, Creativity, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission don’t want to hear a word of it and any complaints to the Australian Press Council result in the Press Council bending over backwards to find any actual instances of racial and religious vilification of White people or Creators as non-existent. It then goes on to reinforce the original article’s examples of racial and religious vilification.

http://sacreator.com/blog/2009/08/04/another-hypocritical-article-from-the-msm The decision from the Australian Press Council in relation to a smear article by one of Australia’s media hacks can be found below the original article and comment at the bottom of the page.

Yes, the media with their unfounded stories do “create a risk of harassment, risk of physical abuse and risk of intimidation, risk of loss of jobs,” – I for one can testify to that fact – and I did point that out to the Australian Press Council and Human Rights Commission, but when you are White and not a follower of a megabucks multicultural religion, you and your beliefs just do not matter one iota to august bodies like the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, and the Australian Press Council.

Get a move on White Australia, your time is fast running out.

Cailen.

Anti-Bikie Laws Already Used Against Non-Bike Riding Folk

Yes, the title says it all. You don’t need to ride a motorcycle, be part of an outlaw motorcycle club, or even have the merest hint of association with a biker for you too be targeted under the so-called “Anti-Bikie Laws.”

 

From Luke McKee/MCKEELUKELEDGERD:

[NSW law] 60C Was introduced because of “motocycle gangs” and the new police powers have only been used on 3 people according to The NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR). YES [u]only 3 people have accused of this crime, and I’m the only one after it was upgraded to 5 years jail in the 2006 gang laws bill that was prompted as a knee-jerk reaction to the Cronulla riots[/u]. Those gang laws make CCTV to protect your own home illegal if it’s argued you don’t like corrupt elements of NSW Police that threaten your family.

http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/audio/nsw-gang-laws-already-exist-being-used-against-non-gang-members

 

Australia, don’t make yourself an easy target, fight back against these Stalinist laws now, or tomorrow may be to late.

I’M AGAINST THE ANTI-BIKIE LEGISLATION: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=62465907886&ref=mf

Cailen.

Abos and Pregnant Women to get Free Flu Vaccine – White Men to go to Hell

“Today we are announcing that the seasonal flu vaccine will be available free of charge to more than two million extra Australians, particularly pregnant women and indigenous Australians,” Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon told Channel 9.

Previously, just under 3 million people aged 65 and over were entitled to free flu vaccine. Now that all Abos and pregnant women are to receive free flu vaccine shots, this will bring the number up to about 4.5 million receiving the vaccine.

The theory behind the Federal Government’s proposal is that indigenous people – rich, poor or otherwise – are more important to the nation than White people. White women only become worthy of saving after becoming pregnant, which is when politically correct assistance kicks in. According to the Federal Government, there is no politically correct excuse for assisting White men – rich, poor or otherwise.

Cailen.

New ‘thoughtcrime’ laws for Australia

New laws may counter racist attacks

Michael Harvey: Herald Sun | June 19, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25657370-661,00.html

VICIOUS attacks against Indian students have prompted the Rudd Government to consider a legal crackdown on hate-mongers.

Investigations have started into creating a specific offence of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of race.

While state assault laws already deal with thugs who personally commit attacks, the potential federal changes would focus, for example, on those responsible for sending SMS messages that urge acts of violence on individuals.

Existing sedition provisions of counter-terrorism laws cover incitement on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity – but only against groups, not individuals.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland has raised the prospect of redressing the balance in response to the alarming spate of assaults on Indians in Melbourne.

This would be achieved by bringing forward a key part of the Government’s review of counter-terrorism laws.

In comments to Parliament this week, Mr McClelland said the Government was in the processing of responding to Law Reform Commission recommendations to change sedition laws.

“Currently there is at the federal level, as you would be aware, an offence of inciting violence against a group of individuals on the basis of their race, religion or ethnicity,” he said.

“As part of a response to recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission, the Government is examining the possibility of amending that offence to include a criterion of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of that individual’s race, religion, ethnicity or nationality.”

In 2006, the commission recommended alterations including changing the offence’s title from sedition to “urging violence” and repealing obsolete provisions.

The Brumby Government moved this month for judges to take hatred – motivated by race, religion, gender or sexual orientation – into account as an aggravating factor when considering sentences.

Comment:
The following comment was submitted to the editors of the Herald Sun.

This is thoughtcrime law where a simple smack in the teeth and a deliberately false report of a racial slur will gain you a longer prison sentence than a psycho who gets their jollies brutally bashing another almost to death. To make matters worse, just like existing State and Federal Racial Vilification Laws, this law will not be used to protect all people, but will be used as a wedge placing the protected “minorities” on one side of the fence and unprotected White Australians living in fear of false accusations on the other. But then, what would you expect from governments that approve of legislation allowing discrimination against White heterosexual males in the workplace?

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park, SA.

Australia to Protect Indian Students from Evil Racists – ROTFLMWAO!

We will protect Indian students: Smith

The Advertiser | May 31, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25564486-5005962,00.html

FOREIGN Minister Stephen Smith says Australia is doing all it can to prevent more attacks on Indian students.

They include two stabbings in Melbourne last week that have left one man fighting for his life in hospital.

Indian authorities believe there’s a racial element at work.

Mr Smith told Network Ten the government is working with the Indian community in Australia and India as well as state authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice and to ensure a safe environment for all international students.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has discussed the problem with Indian Prime Mininster Manmohan Singh.

The discussions come as more than a thousand members of Victoria’s Indian population marched along Melbourne’s main street to protest against the rising number of violent attacks against its community.

The protesters chanted and cheered as they marched down Swanston Street in the city centre.
Commuters had their journeys interrupted as trams were delayed while as the group made its way towards Parliament House.

The Federation of Indian Students of Australia says an increasing number of Indian students are being attacked in what it says are hate crimes.

Related:
Indian students block Melbourne traffic
18 arrests amid Indian protest over Melbourne race violence
Indian students abandon Flinders Street protest
Police ‘punched’ Indian protesters
Kill claim in racism storm


Comment:

One little, two little, three little Indians
Four little, five little, six little Indians
Seven little, eight little, nine little Indians
Ten little Indian boys.
Ten little, nine little, eight little Indians
Seven little, six little, five little Indians
Four little, three little, two little Indians
One little Indian boy.
And then there were None!

As per usual, the media and general public are going crazy accusing every second White Australian of being an evil Indian stabbing, Mexican hating racist. As much as I’d like it to be true, it’s not. The Mexican in question, Sol Trujillo, is the former head of Telstra (Australian Telecom). As such, he’s hated for his role as the chief of that company, not for being a Spic.

The Indians are different. They are hated simply for being Indians; yet oddly enough, it’s not White Australians that hate them, it’s imported Black Africans, Middle Easterners and just about every Muslim.

One might think that the Indian “students” are temporary visitors that we have to ensure the safety of at all costs. However, whether they are currently students or not, they are just another load of imported Australians who after their graduation from the halls of “higher learning” will remain in Australia as permanent residents.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that along with the Indians we are importing, we are importing their own racial and religious problems into Australia. Muslims: Africans and Arabs. Even if the Africans and Arabs are Christian or atheist, they still take the side of the most militant of their racial cultures – and that is the Muslim.

How do I know this? It’s been happening for several years now. Each time the media and government decry the behaviour of “Australian racists,” but just sometimes the truth slips through.

Last year in Adelaide, there were a string of racially motivated attacks against Indian university students. The Indian community themselves declared it to be attacks from the Lebanese community.

At roughly the same time in Melbourne, the attacks on Indian students were by Black Africans. See:
http://sacreator.com/blog/2008/09/13/african-youth-gangs-assault-indian-taxi-drivers

And so we know where to lay the blame for the violence – but will anything be done about it? No. To do what the Indian community wants and charge the perpetrators with a “hate crime” will never happen because the perpetrators are not White. However, if a White man such as myself gets into a scuffle with an Indian, you can bet your gonads that he will be charged with a “hate crime” – even if only to set an example for other White racists and to pander to the multicultural community.

How do we end these attacks? Ship them home. The Africans, the Indians, the Arabs and their Jewish pals, and the Asians. Then we can decide who can come into this country and study.

I for one know that as well as our streets being safer, the quality of the students will also greatly increase – mainly because they wont be using the university system as a back door to permanent residency in Australia.

Cailen.

Update – June 1, 2009: Worried parents call student back from Aus

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Worried-parents-call-student-back-from-Aus/articleshow/4601485.cms

GURGAON/NEW DELHI: Last September, 19-year-old Mukul Khanna had gone to Macquarie University, Sydney, all excited about finishing his BBA there and then probably settling in Australia. Less than a year later, he has returned to his Gurgaon home, called back by parents who hit the panic button after a friend of his was bashed up in Sydney two weeks back.

Sitting in his DLF Phase-V home, Dinesh Khanna, Mukul’s hotelier father tells TOI: “I know my son will now have to drop a year because he won’t get admission anywhere. But I am relieved that he is away from that madness.”

Mukul though says that fear among the Indian student population in Sydney, Melbourne and other cities is on the rise. “They target all Asian students including Pakistani and Sri Lankans. A lot of my Pakistani friends have left the place after being brutally attacked and robbed. Interestingly, the attackers are mostly not locals and are themselves people of foreign origin who resent the fact that Indian students go there in large numbers and take up jobs which may otherwise have gone to them.”

Marxist Family Court = Stolen Generations of White Children

In case you didn’t know it, the Family Court of Australia has an intense hatred of White people who do not follow the politically correct standards of Christian-Marxist doctrines. If a case is man vs woman, heterosexual vs homosexual, White vs Black – the politically correct will almost certainly win for that reason alone.

However, like everything in society overshadowed by Christian-Marxist doctrines. Anytime a parent appears before the Family Court of Australia with anything but politically correct views, they are invariably chastised by the court for being “Nazis” and ordered to comply with what Christian-Marxist-Jewish-Muslim-Sorry to Abo loving society has determined to be the acceptable norm.

According to the May 6, 2009 edition of the Sydney Telegraph:
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25435753-5005941,00.html

Deputy Chief Justice John Faulks ruled in the Family Court that the German-born woman – who like her estranged Australian partner had been a skinhead – be banned from viewing Nazi websites when the child was in her care or inciting racial hatred in front of the child.

According to the politically correct of this world, any White person who espouses pride in their culture, heritage or nation is a “Nazi,” guilty of “inciting racial hatred.” Being German-born is classed as strike two, and calling yourself a skinhead is strike three. As far as determining what are and what are not “Nazi websites” – it has already been stated at the beginning of this paragraph. If it wasn’t for the fact that both parents are “Nazi,” the child would have undoubtedly been forcibly removed from the “Nazi” parent and handed to the PC parent.

A stolen child: Even so, although there is no mention of fear for the child’s health and safety, the Family Court has prepared the road ahead for the state to seize the child from the “Nazi” parents and hand him or her over to a politically correct, speed snorting, multi-racial, same-sex, paedophile couple.

What’s more, this is not the first time the Family Court has decided a case in such a way. It happens all the time, but parents are in such fear of losing their children, they keep quiet about it. So other than getting worse, nothing really changes. Well, I don’t fear the Family Court. Never did, never will. In 2002 when trying (for the umpteenth time) to get access to my own daughter, Stephanie Campbell, the judge presiding over the case ordered that I was not to direct her to any websites. Apparently I can’t be trusted to determine what is right and wrong for my own child to view, because according to the Family Court, I am a Nazi who denies Christian values.

And what was the basis for such a judgement by the Family Court’s loathsome representative of Christian-Marxist values? The simple answer is, I am a Creator.

Thanks to the Family Court of Australia, I have not seen my daughter, Stephanie Campbell, since 1991 when she was a year old and I don’t expect to ever see her again.

Cailen.

P.S. Just in case Stephanie Campbell who was born in 1990 in Brisbane, in the state of Queensland, Australia, decides to Google herself, Stephanie Campbell, I have made sure to include her name, Stephanie Campbell numerous times within this article. I may not expect to see Stephanie Campbell again, but there are always possibilities.

Cailen Cambeul,
The racist formerly known as Colin Campbell,
Father of Stephanie Campbell.

Federal Government Orders Political Indoctrination of Two Year Olds

Pre-school guidelines for activists

Susie Obrien, Daniel Wills: The Advertser | April 13, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25331336-5006301,00.html

HIGH-PROFILE Labor MP Maxine McKew wants to train toddlers and pre-school children to become political activists.

She has drafted her controversial Early Years Learning Framework which, if adopted, would cover all kindergartens, childcare centres and other early childhood settings.

The guidelines would also provide the basis for the education and care of all Australian pre-schoolers and are due to be implemented in July.

Ms McKew, the woman who ousted former Prime Minister John Howard at the 2007 election, is the Parliamentary Secretary for Early Childhood Education and Child Care. She wants children to:

CONTRIBUTE in a meaningful way to reconciliation, including flying the Aboriginal flag and inviting elders to give talks.

USE “social inclusion puppets” and “persona dolls” to explore exclusion and ethical issues.

CHALLENGE and resist bias and discrimination.

TAKE action in unfair situations and learn to act when injustice occurs.

ASSESS and act on power dynamics as they get older.

The political emphasis of the guidelines has divided early learning experts.

Leading educational consultant Kathy Walker has questioned the merits of such issues being “rammed down the throats” of two, three and four-year olds.

“Although I welcome the emphasis on play-based learning, there is an air of political correctness about the document overall,” she said.

University of South Australia early childhood education expert Anne Glover said racism was a major problem in SA and steps must be taken to eradicate “negative attitudes” in early childhood.

“While some people might say this is a form of social engineering, all our activity is some kind of engineering, and it’s all political,” she said yesterday. “Children aren’t born with prejudice, they aren’t born with negative attitudes, they learn them from their environment.”

SA Association of State School Organisations director David Knuckey said members of his council had been involved in lengthy consultation sessions on the framework. He said it was critical educational values were not dictated by government bodies.

“Certainly you would want children to learn the values associated with what we would call social inclusion,” he said. “But it is important these policies, these agendas, are being driven by community ideals and not a political agenda.”

Under the $700,000 new approach to early childhood education, the goal will be to “promote children’s civic participation and nurture socially responsible citizens for a future world,” a Federal Government February 2009 briefing paper states.

There is also a strong emphasis on caring for the environment and reconciliation.

The guidelines also focus strongly on play-based learning, the importance of communication and language, the role of the family in children’s lives and social and emotional development.

Charles Sturt University Professor Jennifer Sumsion, who is leading the development of the guidelines, said last night feedback was still being received from stakeholders.

“But we do not anticipate a general message change,” she said. “The feedback from the early learning sector has been very positive.”


Comment:
Number 22 of 47 in the Adelaide Advertiser.

They already have the majority of sheeple responding to keywords such as, “racist” and “Nazi.” Liberal and Labor have been pushing the left-wing agenda with school children for decades. This is just the old Labor method of taking one step extra to the left to keep ahead of Liberal – who will of course maintain step with the politically correct crowd so they don’t get branded by the same old keywords. Take heed of the old saying, “Fight fire with fire,” and teach your children to respond with some keywords that actually do make sense in today’s society, “Marxist,” “totalitarian” and “reconciliation supremacists.”

Other references I could have included in the above comment are, Stalinists, Black Supremacists, Asian Supremacists, Jewish Supremacists, Islamic Supremacists, self hating Whites, feminists, homosexuals, lesbians and references to religious groups that try to enforce a left-wing agenda upon White people but refuse to allow the same for their own: Christians, Muslims and Jews.

Yes, according to all of the groups above, little White children must feel guilty for the the imagined sins of their fathers. Not too long to go and children will be told that the only way to remove the stain of “racism” from their conscience is to report their parents for breach of Racial Vilification Law.

No, that’s already done by school teachers in feel good essays for Recon$iliation.

The following comment was refused publication at
http://www.news.com.au/comments/0,23600,25331516-421,00.html

I remember sitting on a bus behind some Flinders University students during the last national election. One of the girls turned to another and pointed to a harmless old lady who appeared to be in her 60’s and said that “racism will be alive and well until THAT generation of White people is killed off!” As abhorrent as that conversation was to witness, I can only surmise that we will soon be hearing the same from four, five and six year olds as they point the finger and make the same declarations aimed at their own parents.

Cailen Cambeul, Oaklands Park.

Aussie Babies Exposed to TB by Imported Doctor

Tuberculosis is an almost unheard of disease in Australia, but thanks to Adelaide’s Women’s and Children’s Hospital’s overuse of imported non-White doctors, TB has returned to bite it in the arse.

Due to the incompetence of immigration authorities, an imported doctor has exposed about 300 babies in the Neo-natal Intensive Care Unit and the Special Care Baby Unit to tuberculosis.

When contacted, the Women’s and Children’s hospital refused to comment on the country of origin or the racial makeup of the TB riddled quack, but assured concerned parents that the imported doctor is now on sick-leave.

A routine examination of the recently imported doctor by SA Health returned a positive result for TB, not only exposing about 300 Aussie new-borns to TB but also exposing the look-the-other-way attitude of Australian immigration authorities in their over-zealous efforts to re-colonise Australia in a dark demographic.

For babies under 3 months of age, tests for TB are ineffective. A spokesman for the Women’s and Children’s Hospital offered preventative antibiotics with a screening test at 3 months and a further test at six months.

For more information phone 1800 131 231.

Cailen Cambeul.

Australian internet filter to be compulsory

Jennifer Dudley-Nicholson: The Courier Mail | October 29, 2008

THE Federal Government plans to make internet censorship compulsory, putting Australia in the same league as China, Iran and North Korea.

The Government will not let users opt out of the proposed national internet filter, which could ban controversial websites on such subject as euthanasia or anorexia, when it is introduced.

Broadband, Communications and Digital Economy Minister Stephen Conroy admitted the Federal Government’s $44.2 million internet censorship plan would now include two tiers – one level of mandatory filtering for all Australians and an optional level that will provide a “clean feed“, censoring adult material.

Despite planning to hold “live trials” before the end of the year, Senator Conroy said it was not known what content the mandatory filter would bar, with euthanasia or pro-anorexia sites on the chopping block.

“We are talking about mandatory blocking, where possible, of illegal material,” he told a Senate Estimates Committee. [more ...]


Comment:
This also means that all sites or blogs written by political dissenters will be banned – unless of course your political dissention is in line with party (Labor, Liberal, Family First, et al) policy.

Anything deemed racist will be banned. Although this will not effect the millions of anti-White racist sites and blogs. Sites that purport to be “anti-racist” but in reality promote anti-White racism will be the beneficiaries of your future google searches.

All free hosting sites such as Google blogs, Yahoo’s Geocities and Lycos’ Angelfire will be blocked from Australians.

And of course, this site will be blocked.

How will this effect people such as myself? It means that instead of taking on every issue I take offence to and using a blog to make sure I have my say on the matter and leaving it at that until the next topic of interest comes up, I will be forced to pick and choose until I find a topic that is important enough to waste money on thousands of leaflets and the distribution process that goes along with it – and that’s something I’ve had a lot of experience doing.

The rest of you “Australians” can crawl into your kennels and bark at the JOG for all I care. I have made my plans and I know precisely what I’m capable of accomplishing.

Cailen.