A clearly terrified Prime Minister Gillard is shielded from the marauding rabble
Image: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/cue-whitney-houston-heres-julia-gillards-bodyguard/story-e6frea8c-1226254942911

Image: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092021/Julia-Gillard-rescued-Australia-Day-Aboriginal-protesters-shes-dragged-safety.html

Police have stated that no criminal charges will be made against the Aboriginal "activists."

Prime Minister Gillard's shoe was also stolen during the affray and is being kept for sale on eBay.

https://www.google.com/search?q=prime+minister+gillard+aboriginal+activist+australia+day+attacked&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

Cailen.

Update Jan 28: The blame has now shifted from Aboriginals to blaming possibly “white supporters” (try telling one of those “white supporters” that they are not Aboriginal – not Indigenous to this land and you will find yourself charged under Racial Vilification Laws for denying their “Aboriginality”) and when they can, totally ignoring the violence to falsely accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of “inciting violence” with “racist” speech. Other elements have chosen to concentrate on the fact that the problem began because Prime Minister Ju-Liar Gillard’s staff have been discovered to have been involved in instigating the violence of the day – although they only intended for Abbott to be on the receiving end in an attempt to make their Ju-Liar look good.

The other thing – and possibly this is the most important and most disgusting of all the lies being passed around after Canberra’s Black Power Race Riots is the claim from all media and government sources that this is the first instance of Aboriginal violence in more than 200 years. What a load of HORSE SHIT! Check your history, check your murder rates, your records of violence … IF you are able to discover the truth, you will find that Whites are always being bashed by groups of Australia’s wonderful Indigenous people. It is almost always for racial reasons. If it’s not because the victim is White so he must have something worth stealing, or Black Supremacists out for another episode of bashing “White c*nts,” then it’s part and parcel of a Black Deaths in Custody or Land Rights March.

But the truth about Australia’s Aboriginal violence is something you will rarely discover when going through official channels. When a White is beaten by non-Whites of any ethnicity and the police become involved, the police almost always try to find a way to end the investigation before it starts. They may close their notebooks and just nod their heads in understanding, or they may threaten you with charges of Racial Vilification if you attempt to make an official complaint. Other times they will just shrug and say it’s not their fault, they are only following orders. And even when the non-White is arrested and convicted, the judge will speak of his understanding of the hard life or difficult upbringing that the perpetrator has been forced to lead. The sentence will be set to the required minimum and it will be recorded as an uneventful criminal act with no racial overtones. Hence there are no – or near enough to no records in Australia that show racially motivated Aboriginal or any other non-White ethnicity for that matter – crime.

I wonder how many thousands have died over the years while hearing shouts of “WHITE C*NT!” as they are kicked to death?

And yet, although I blame the Aboriginals for their criminal behaviour and the support it induces within their own community, the ones I hold to account are the White Race-Traitors who have gone out of their way to make it a crime to tell the truth in this once great nation. Without a doubt, Aboriginal Australians will eventually be granted their much sought sovereign land and be able to separate themselves from White Australia (which, believe it or not, I support); but for you White traitors, there is no sovereign escape plan – for you there is only a noose waiting at the end a rope. Remember that Prime Minister Ju-Liar Gillard, Abbott and the rest of you Race-Traitors: You can flee in terror from the “Aboriginal activists” today, but tomorrow, when we White activists come after you, you will be forced to pay for your sins against the White Race – and no amount of running will save you.

Cailen.
Another victim of Black violence brought on by White Race-Traitors.

Print Friendly Page

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/big-australia-back-on-the-agenda/story-fn9hm1gu-1226154435021

Matthew Franklin, Chief political correspondent | The Australian | October 01, 2011

TRADE Minister Craig Emerson has reignited the Big Australia debate by insisting Australia must boost immigration levels to fully exploit its potential in the “Asian century”.

Further Discussion at http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/there_will_be_no_big_australia_under_the_government_i_lead

Skills shortage? Try getting training when you don’t meet particular politically correct criteria. For that matter, try obtaining gainful employment when you do have the training, skills and experience, but still fall short of that all invasive politically correct criteria. Is Trade Minister Craig Emerson talking about immigration or the justification of sustained and deliberate importation of the unwanted and untrainable? Labor had better raise the dole for the current batch of mainly European and all Indigenous Australians because we Australians don’t have a hope in hell retaining employment in Labor’s “Asian century.” Or as it should be called, the Slave Labour Century.

But wait, there’s more … buy two Coolies for the cost of a single Aussie and they’ll chuck in a third for free. Leading of course to Labor’s next election slogan, “Cheaper By the Dozen!”

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA.

Print Friendly Page

http://www.massoutrage.com

MassOutrage is as relevant to Australia as it is to the USA. So if you are in a child custody dispute, and especially male, I suggest you read the following. If you think that abuse of the Family Law system can only happen in America, think again. Forewarned is forearmed. ~ Cailen.

Intervention orders clogging our Australian courts

Mark Russell | The Age | June 26, 2011

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/intervention-orders-clogging-our-courts-20110625-1gkwp.html#ixzz1QJsCvvC1

A HUGE surge in frivolous intervention order applications is clogging up the courts … resulting in the bans being ‘’thrown around like confetti’’ …

… the system was open to abuse because the applications were free of charge and magistrates could be reluctant to refuse an intervention order in case they were blamed for failing to prevent a subsequent incidence of domestic violence.

And another from Australia: http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/when-an-avo-is-just-a-tactic-in-a-silly-argument

MassOutrage contains real-world practical information about what to do when you are being attacked in a Family or Juvenile Court by a state child protection agency such as the Dept. of Children and Families, by false allegations of abuse to get a restraining order, or by a divorce court which is not treating you fairly. This information will help you fight back, so that you can save your family and your children.

If you been hit with any of the three aspects of family law I call the “Iron Triangle”, 1) Restraining Orders or Orders of Protection; 2) Your state child protective services or Dept. of Children and Families (DCF); or 3) a Divorce/Paternity case, MassOutrage exposes their dirty tricks, and provides legal information on how to oppose them and win.

State courts and agencies war against families, and often convince family members to use restraining orders or the DCF agency as a weapon. If the person succumbs to the temptation, in order to get a leg up in court, he or she often ends up ruining not just the other parent, but the children as well.

Restraining orders or Orders of Protection are supposed to protect petitioners from abuse, but are often used for dumping a boyfriend, as a first strike in a divorce, or out of spite. Often no real abuse exists, but courts issue them much too easily, and a violation brings arrest and jail. A huge domestic abuse industry makes lots of money exploiting the problem.

Departments of Children and Families, called other names in different states, allegedly protect children from abuse and neglect. However, they often make allegations on flimsy evidence, do poor investigations, and take children from families wrongly, ruining them in the process. Over 500,000 children are in state custody at any one time in the United States.

Divorce and paternity cases often leave everyone broke, angry, and exhausted. Children need both parents, but courts often do not see it that way, despite their own policies to promote shared parenting. See, for example, this Massachusetts official court booklet called Planning for Shared Parenting. (click the title.)

This is a very brief overview of the problem. On this site, you will find detailed information analyzing each of these issues, reviewing the dirty tricks used by agencies and courts, and explaining exactly how to fight back and deal with the situation.

Attorney Gregory A. Hession prepared MassOutrage because so many clients have endured outrageous mistreatment at the hands of family and juvenile courts, or state child protective services. After 16 years of legal practice, he continually adds material that he learns to this web site, to help you fight your own case.

All of the available resources are set out in links on the right, which you can click to get to the information you want to study.

May you find needed help, encouragement and hope here, even when the battle is hard and long.

Print Friendly Page

From: http://www.unhcr.no/Pdf/Baltic_nordic_HL_2011/May_2011.pdf

“A report released by the (Oslo) police on Wednesday states that all assault rapes during last year were committed by men with a non-Western origin. All the reported rapes during the last 5 years are done by men with a foreign origin. Police inspector Hanne Kristin Rodhe says the perpetrators often are unemployed, have been asylum-seekers during the last five years and come from a traumatized environment. She adds that their perception of women can be one of the motives behind the rapes.”

Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt said on his Blog:
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/all_rapes_in_oslo_by_foreigners_police

“Australia has not reported any such marked pattern.”

So I asked in his Comments section: (which is guaranteed refused publication in the Adelaide Advertiser or the Punch because us recalcitrant “racists” are not permitted to question society or the social, racial and political agendas of those whom we are supposed to think of as our betters …)

Could that be because Australia refuses to track or just refuses to publish race based crime statistics? What I do know is that most of the time when talking about society in general, the statistics typically speak of foreign born Australians and Australian residents along with those born in Australia of foreign born parents compared with those of families consisting of two or more generations born in Australia, and Australian Indigenous people.

This all boils down to:
New Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Settled Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Indigenous Australians (who thanks to today’s laws and variable statistics are also often of an indeterminate race, religion and origin).

My question is: are we just PC fools burying our heads in the sand by accepting the refusal of government bodies to release accurate statistical data comparable to accumulated statistics from overseas? Or are we the most racially harmonious nation on Earth like we are constantly told? Or is it too racist to ask for clarification?

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA

Statistics from the FBI Website

http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/2009hatecrimestats_112210

Hate Crime Statistics, 2009, includes the following information:

Of the 6,598 single-bias incidents, 48.5 percent were motivated by a racial bias, 19.7 percent were motivated by a religious bias, 18.5 percent were motivated by a sexual-orientation bias, and 11.8 percent were motivated by an ethnicity/national origin bias. Bias against a disability accounted for 1.5 percent of single-bias incidents.

There were 4,793 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against persons in 2009. Intimidation accounted for 45.0 percent of crimes against persons, simple assaults for 35.3 percent, and aggravated assaults for 19.1 percent. Other offenses, including nine forcible rapes and eight murders, accounted for the remainder.

There were 2,970 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against property; most of these (83.0 percent) were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism. The remaining 17.0 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other offenses.

An analysis of data for single-bias hate crime incident victims revealed that 48.8 percent were targeted because of the offender’s bias against a race, 18.9 percent because of a bias against a religious belief, 17.8 percent because of a sexual orientation bias, 13.3 percent because of an ethnicity/national origin bias, and 1.2 percent because of a disability bias.
Of the 6,225 known offenders, 62.4 percent were white, 18.5 percent were black, 7.3 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group), 1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 0.7 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander. The race was unknown for the remaining known offenders.

The largest percentage (31.3 percent) of hate crime incidents occurred in or near homes. In addition, 17.2 percent took place on highways, roads, alleys, or streets; 11.4 percent happened at schools or colleges; 6.1 percent in parking lots or garages; and 4.3 percent in churches, synagogues, or temples. The remaining 29.7 percent of hate crime incidents took place at other specified locations, multiple locations, or other/unknown locations.

For statistical purposes, the US Government’s Department of Justice considers there to be only four different races: Black, Asian, Native American and White. Those classed as White by the DOJ include Europeans as well as Arabs, Jews and Mestizos (Mexican, Central and South Americans of mixed or native ancestry).

He sure as hell doesn’t think he’s White. Why should we?

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page

A media ideologist rightfully takes the Federal Government to task in its poor choice of street corner doom-sayers, but takes the opportunity to marginalise anyone that disagrees with his own extremist the Earth is doomed stance.

Forget Cate when it comes to climate

Adam Ferrier | The Australian | May 30, 2011

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/forget-cate-when-it-comes-to-climate/story-fn59niix-1226065155258

Extract: “Apart from some on the lunatic fringe everyone has already said yes – more or less. Yes, we all agree there is an issue with climate change, and yes we would like to do something about it.”

Yes, you are an advertising guru that is 100% right on the reasons not to use Cate Blanchett for the campaign, but you are on the lunatic fringe that says let’s disregard history and only take into account weather stats since 1900 or so. The reality is very different to what those in your fringe camp think. The average person will accept anything, right or wrong if it does not interfere with their beer, TV and football, but will scrutinise everything to the infinite degree if it even threatens to interfere with their beer, TV and football – of that at least we can agree. But do not make the mistake of confusing the laissez-faire attitude of the average Australian as acceptance of man made climate change, and inquiry into the whys and wherefores of political exploitation as proof people are part of a lunatic (supposedly denialist) fringe, because it is sweeping statements like that which reveal to anyone capable of reading it, that you are talking from the lunatic (warmist) fringe.

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA.

Print Friendly Page

AAP: Adelaide Advertiser | May 5, 2011

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/indians-may-fill-resources-skills-gap/story-e6frea7c-1226050272001

TENS of thousands of Indian graduates could be trained to Australian standards in a bid to plug the gap in Australia’s booming resources sector.

A Skills Australia report earlier this week said Australia would need 2.4 million extra skilled workers in the next four years to meet the demands of the mining boom.

Forget importing more bloody Indians. Train 2.4 million unemployed Australians instead.

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page

“Abraham, Moses and David may not be everyone’s fathers in faith but certainly they are all our fathers in culture,” said Mr Abbott.

Mr Abbott, For your information the mythical Abraham, Moses and David are not my fathers in faith or culture anymore than they were my fathers in ethnicity. Nor did the stories of these mythical patriarchs of Judaism, Islam and Christian zealots like yourself have contain moral values equal that which I and most Australians live by today.

Abraham was an infanticidal pimp.

Moses was a genocidal magician.

David was a bandit chief turned king who ended his life as a womanising, adulterous murderer.

Who in their right mind that is not a Jew, would want to link themselves in any way at all to such textbook scoundrels? Mr Abbott, I am not a Jew! Next election, I will be voting for Australia First.

Cailen.

For more information on Jewish bible hoaxes, see Chapter 10 of Nature’s Eternal Religion http://creativityalliance.com/eBook-BenKlassen-Nature’sEternalReligion.pdf.

Print Friendly Page

Plea to free sad asylum kids

Sean Fewster | Herald Sun | March 08, 2011

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/plea-to-free-sad-asylum-kids/story-e6frf7l6-1226017347265

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/if_they_win_more_children_will_get_traumatised_too

AN Iranian boy and girl have asked a court to release them from an asylum seeker camp centre because they are sad.

The children, aged three and eight, say they will not recover from nightmares about their boat trip to Australia unless they are released from custody.

A Federal Court action, filed by their parents, is levelled against Inverbrackie Detention Centre, in the Adelaide Hills, which opened in December.

The parents want to be released as well.

I was at the Inverbrackie Detention Centre only two weeks ago. There is no razor wire. The main street into the former Army Married Quarters is blocked by a boom gate with an elderly gentleman ready to check your authorisation if you bother to knock on his door. Other street entries into the area are blocked by medium sized gates. Even pool fencing supplies more security. Community parks and playgrounds are surrounded by low wire fencing that any teenager could hurdle. And security personnel? Not a uniform to be seen. The houses themselves are the basic 1980′s design Army Married Quarters, upgraded with air-conditioning, full furnishings, wide screen TV’s, internet, white goods, … all the mod cons that no Army Married Quarter has ever or will ever receive.

As someone who spent many years living in Army Married Quarters in conditions nowhere near as pleasant as Inverbrackie Detention Centre, perhaps I should sue the Fed for the trauma inflicted upon me while being forced to live in such horrendous substandard conditions?

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA

Print Friendly Page

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/what_country_is_brandis_describing

Liberal frontbencher George Brandis in the Sydney Morning Herald:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/politicans-must-defend-the-multicultural-project-20110222-1b400.htm

When I was growing up in Sydney in the 1960s, Petersham was a popular place of settlement for immigrant families – “New Australians”, as they were often called.

Our next-door neighbours were Chinese, next to them was a Greek family, there was an Italian family directly across the street. At my local convent school, St Thomas’s in Lewisham, almost half of the kids were from non-English speaking backgrounds.…

With each new wave of settlement there has been, from some among the established population, suspicion and resentment. Equally there has been, among those newly arrived, fear of the new and unknown, and a desire to cluster together to preserve the traditions and customs of their homeland… Then, the new generation, whose experience is only of this country, seeks to break free of the bonds of its parents’ culture and identifies primarily with being Australian.

George Brandis is the federal shadow attorney-general.

The following comment was snipped for length by the Herald Sun’s Andrew Bolt Blog, but can be read here in its entirety.

The first ten years of my life were spent in what today would probably be called the multicultural success of the planned community/city of Elizabeth in South Oz. The fact is, it was multi-ethnic from a strictly European point of view and can be both classed as a failure and a success, depending on how much hindsight you have.

Elizabethans of the 60′s and 70′s were predominately of British origin. The remainder were Europeans from the South of Spain to the North of Scandinavia, but the majority were Germans, Greeks and Italians. When first arriving in Australia, all immigrants who had not already made plans, were given the option: live in the immigration camps in appalling conditions until you can find your own accommodation, or move to Elizabeth and accept government housing. My grandparents chose to live in the camp until their own home was completed, but my parents who came from Scotland as children, willingly moved into government housing in Elizabeth which is where I noticed the following issues. It was not uncommon for a non-English speaking family to reject Australia, refuse to allow their children to speak English at home or have English speaking friends in their homes. Most of those types were members of ethnic social clubs and often returned “home” to their own country within a few years.

Those that stayed didn’t always integrate well, but by the 80′s they had integrated to some degree because they had lived here for twenty plus years. Their children were fully integrated, bi-lingual and were no different from the rest of us of British origin. George Brandis might call that a multicultural success, but considering much of the culture was the same, we were racially the same (bear in mind that John Howard has stated that multiculturalism is really multiracialism which is the integration of non-Europeans into Australia) and the only real difference was language. Some could not overcome that but most eventually did. Sure, the Italians (for example) worked hard the moment they got here, but reports from my parents generation are that they (the English speakers) were refused for jobs because they did not speak Italian. I can testify that I had the same problem in the 80′s because I did not speak Vietnamese and that it was rather annoying to say the least. But what did I find by the 90′s? The second generation of Italians to be born in this country had turned their backs on Australia. Unlike their parents who were my peers, they adopted the stance that we were all “Skips” and inferior to Italians.

All of this means that while the process of integration was in place, those of the same race but originating from a different nation and of a different language can get along without any problems. It was the failed multicultural experiments of the 80′s and on that turned those Australian children into Italian Nationalists.

Keeping all of that in mind, there is no evidence that multiculturalism has been a success. All it has done is built separatism and since 1973 it has brought on racial and cultural enclaves such as Vietnamese run Cabramatta which was a no-go zone for whites in the 80′s and today’s Middle Eastern crime war-zone of Bankstown. And when you compare that to other nations who do not have us “white racists” to contend with, you notice that they too are divided into racial and cultural enclaves. At least with a second generation Australian kid claiming he’s Italian, you can send him home so he wakes up to himself and realises that us “Skips” are not his enemy. Can’t say the same for a Tongan, a Lebanese or Chinese.

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA

Update Feb 26, 2011: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_multiculturalism_is_what_its_fans_dare_not_say

Print Friendly Page

New book reveals freed Mandela told Hawke: I owe it to you

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/new-book-reveals-freed-mandela-told-hawke-i-owe-it-to-you/story-e6frg6nf-1225889562684

IN 1990, Nelson Mandela told Bob Hawke in Australia: “I want you to know, Bob, that I am here today, at this time, because of you.”

The former South African president, who had recently been released from prison, uttered those words before his ascent to his country’s top job. [more ...]

… I thought I would show something of what type of person it is that Bob Hawke and those of his ilk really want for Australia and the rest of the White European world.

Rivonia Unmasked!
By Lauritz Strydom

Contrary to popular belief, Nelson Mandela was not a “prophet of peace” nor was he imprisoned for 27 years for “fighting against apartheid.” In fact, Mandela was a communist terrorist who bombed assorted facilities and buildings and killed people, along with other black and Jewish intellectuals of the day. The Rivonia trial was not about “apartheid” it was about murders committed at the hands of Nelson Mandela and others.

From an Amazon.com review:

This book carefully documents the evidence from the Rivonia Trial. Rivonia was a suburb of Johannesburg where the ten defendants secretly met and hid on a farm. Ethnically they were 3 Jews, 2 Indians and the rest black. Nelson Mandela had masqueraded as a cook and gardener.

The trial began in December 1963 and the verdicts were rendered in July 1964. The trial outlines the conspiracy to violently overthrow the South African government.

It proves how the revolutionaries planned and implemented campaigns of sabotage, intimidation, torture, guerilla warfare, violence, disruption of transportation and communications, insurrection and revolution against the government with the assistance of the Communists and other radicals. They planned to manufacture or purchase explosives such as 48,000 land mines each containing 5 pounds of dynamite, 210,000 hand grenades each containing 1/4 pd of dynamite as well as petrol bombs,syringe bombs, thermite bombs, 1,500 timing devices for bombs, as well as molotov cocktails.

Their requirements included 144 tons of ammonium nitrate,21.6 tons of aluminium powder and 15 tons of black powder. They prepared for a nucleus army of 7,000 soldiers. Many to be trained abroad in Communist countries. The campaign was based on the model of successes previously achieved in Algeria and Cuba. More than ten documents written in Nelson Mandela’s handwriting were submitted as evidence. They contained notes on basic and advanced military training and warfare as well as Communist doctrine. Although Mandela denied being a Communist he admitted that the aims and objectives of the ANC and Communist Party were identical. He even spoke of retaliation against non supportive blacks such as murder and cutting off their noses.

The planners were convicted and sentenced to life in prison.

The lesson that may be learned from this is that governments when threatened such as in this case must move harshly. Had these terrorists been convicted of treason and executed things might have turned out differently.

Read it at http://ia360709.us.archive.org/19/items/RivoniaUnmasked/rivonia-unmasked-nelson-mandela-lauritz-strydom.pdf 6.4 MB

Or http://www.archive.org/details/RivoniaUnmasked

Print Friendly Page