A clearly terrified Prime Minister Gillard is shielded from the marauding rabble
Image: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/cue-whitney-houston-heres-julia-gillards-bodyguard/story-e6frea8c-1226254942911

Image: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092021/Julia-Gillard-rescued-Australia-Day-Aboriginal-protesters-shes-dragged-safety.html

Police have stated that no criminal charges will be made against the Aboriginal "activists."

Prime Minister Gillard's shoe was also stolen during the affray and is being kept for sale on eBay.

https://www.google.com/search?q=prime+minister+gillard+aboriginal+activist+australia+day+attacked&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

Cailen.

Update Jan 28: The blame has now shifted from violent Abos to blaming possibly “white supporters” (try telling one of those “white supporters” that they are not Aboriginal – not Indigenous to this land and you will find yourself charged under Racial Vilification Laws for denying their “Aboriginality”) and when they can, totally ignoring the violence to falsely accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of “inciting violence” with “racist” speech. Other elements have chosen to concentrate on the fact that the problem began because Prime Minister Ju-Liar Gillard’s staff have been discovered to have been involved in instigating the violence of the day – although they only intended for Abbott to be on the receiving end in an attempt to make their Ju-Liar look good.

The other thing – and possibly this is the most important and most disgusting of all the lies being passed around after Canberra’s Black Power Race Riots is the claim from all media and government sources that this is the first instance of Aboriginal violence in more than 200 years. What a load of HORSE SHIT! Check your history, check your murder rates, your records of violence … IF you are able to discover the truth, you will find that Whites are always being bashed by groups of Australia’s wonderful Indigenous people. It is almost always for racial reasons. If it’s not because the victim is White so he must have something worth stealing, or Abos out for another episode of bashing “White c*nts,” then it’s part and parcel of a Black Deaths in Custody or Land Rights March.

But the truth about Abo violence is something you will rarely discover when going through official channels. When a White is beaten by non-Whites of any ethnicity and the police become involved, the police almost always try to find a way to end the investigation before it starts. They may close their notebooks and just nod their heads in understanding, or they may threaten you with charges of Racial Vilification if you attempt to make an official complaint. Other times they will just shrug and say it’s not their fault, they are only following orders. And even when the non-White is arrested and convicted, the judge will speak of his understanding of the hard life or difficult upbringing that the perpetrator has been forced to lead. The sentence will be set to the required minimum and it will be recorded as an uneventful criminal act with no racial overtones. Hence there are no – or near enough to no records in Australia that show racially motivated Aboriginal crime.

I wonder how many thousands have died over the years while hearing shouts of “WHITE C*NT!” as they are kicked to death?

And yet, although I blame the Abos for their criminal behaviour and the support it induces within their own community, the ones I hold to account are the White Race-Traitors who have gone out of their way to make it a crime to tell the truth in this once great nation. Without a doubt, Aboriginal Australians will be granted their much sought sovereign land and be able to separate themselves from White Australia; but for you Whites, there is no sovereign escape plan – for you there is only a noose waiting at the end a rope. Remember that Prime Minister Ju-Liar Gillard, Abbott and the rest of you Race-Traitors: You can flee in terror from the “Aboriginal activists” today, but tomorrow, when we come after you, you will be forced to pay for your sins against the White Race – and no amount of running will save you.

Cailen.
Another victim of Black violence brought on by White Race-Traitors.

Print Friendly Page

Google Search: Andrew Bolt Racial Vilification Decision

Editorial: Court muddies the waters for free speech

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/editorial-court-muddies-the-waters-for-free-speech/story-e6freabl-1226154437456

Melvin Mansell | The Advertiser | September 30, 2011

THE full ramifications of this week’s Federal Court judgment against Melbourne columnist Andrew Bolt for breaching racial discrimination laws are still unknown.

But there is no doubt the decision has further muddied the waters for proponents of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

[snip]

There is perhaps a tendency to take for granted concepts such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

But to remain a free country we need to be able to discuss any subject without fear. If you don’t like the views of Andrew Bolt the answer is not to shut him down. The answer does not lie with less debate. The answer lies with more debate, more talking, more exchanging of ideas.

Anything else diminishes us as a society.

(To Melvin Mansell,)

While I agree with your defence of Andrew Bolt, I say bollocks to your hypocrisy! As Editor of the Adelaide Advertiser, you are guilty of shutting down discussion, exchange of ideas and debate on any subject that does not match your totalitarian, Marxist ideology. That you choose to defend Andrew Bolt is not testimony to your belief in freedom of speech, but is instead testimony to your belief in a dictatorial press, libelling the non-politically correct as a matter of due course. You rightly fear for your own livelihood, but you are a bloody hypocrite and you know it.

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park.

Print Friendly Page

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/big-australia-back-on-the-agenda/story-fn9hm1gu-1226154435021

Matthew Franklin, Chief political correspondent | The Australian | October 01, 2011

TRADE Minister Craig Emerson has reignited the Big Australia debate by insisting Australia must boost immigration levels to fully exploit its potential in the “Asian century”.

Further Discussion at http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/there_will_be_no_big_australia_under_the_government_i_lead

Skills shortage? Try getting training when you don’t meet particular politically correct criteria. For that matter, try obtaining gainful employment when you do have the training, skills and experience, but still fall short of that all invasive politically correct criteria. Is Trade Minister Craig Emerson talking about immigration or the justification of sustained and deliberate importation of the unwanted and untrainable? Labor had better raise the dole for the current batch of mainly European and all Indigenous Australians because we Australians don’t have a hope in hell retaining employment in Labor’s “Asian century.” Or as it should be called, the Slave Labour Century.

But wait, there’s more … buy two Coolies for the cost of a single Aussie and they’ll chuck in a third for free. Leading of course to Labor’s next election slogan, “Cheaper By the Dozen!”

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA.

Print Friendly Page

We are concerned about old Aussies without proper community assistance, homelessness amongst youth and families, open borders and security, treaties we never condoned, cheap labour driving Aussies from many jobs and more – while we observe so-called refugees moving into housing commission homes, jobs, welfare bounties and other public benefits. Since 1995, possibly as much as $100 Billion directly and indirectly, has been spent on these parasites. The massive burdens of ‘processing’, the navy, courts, lawyers, super-generous welfare, psychologists, building detention centres and burnt-down centres, teachers, expensive protests, the waste of parliamentary time, security assessments – it just goes on and on. Angry?

This is our country. We stand up for Australians – only. And most dangerous of all, we see the refugee influx as part of a recolonization of Australia driven from the top end of town. We intend to resist the politicians and the do-gooders of every stripe.

Protest Date/Time: September 17, 1pm

Venue: Rooty Hill School Of Arts, 32 Rooty Hill Road, South Rooty Hill (near train station).

Speakers: Asst. Professor Andrew Fraser, Perry Jewell, Dr. Jim Saleam and others (to be advised shortly).

Enquiries 02 8587 0014 ; ausfirst@alphalink.com.au

For the ultimate work on a refugee invasion, read the classic novel written in 1973 – long before the invasion of European societies began – The Camp Of The Saints http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDFs/Camp_of_the_Saints.pdf

Print Friendly Page

It appears that a certain racial and religious element didn’t like the truth being told about the Oslo murderer. See http://sacreator.com/blog/norway-mass-murderer-anders-behring-breivik-is-anti-racist-pro-homosexual-and-pro-israel. Ah well, at least unlike last time, they were very polite and left within minutes. And without confiscating any computer equipment and tax records this time! They were in and out so fast I didn’t even get a chance to say the five words: “I have nothing to say.”

So if somebody tries to tell you that we do not have a political or ideological police force in Australia, tell ‘em their dreamin’.

Cailen.

Related
http://sacreator.com/blog/sa-government-raid-2006
http://sacreator.com/blog/to-the-police-complaints-authority

Question: Are you required to allow police into your home if they are not carrying a warrant?

Answer: No. See Plenty v Dillon – 1991 – HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

Print Friendly Page

http://www.massoutrage.com

MassOutrage is as relevant to Australia as it is to the USA. So if you are in a child custody dispute, and especially male, I suggest you read the following. If you think that abuse of the Family Law system can only happen in America, think again. Forewarned is forearmed. ~ Cailen.

Intervention orders clogging our Australian courts

Mark Russell | The Age | June 26, 2011

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/intervention-orders-clogging-our-courts-20110625-1gkwp.html#ixzz1QJsCvvC1

A HUGE surge in frivolous intervention order applications is clogging up the courts … resulting in the bans being ‘’thrown around like confetti’’ …

… the system was open to abuse because the applications were free of charge and magistrates could be reluctant to refuse an intervention order in case they were blamed for failing to prevent a subsequent incidence of domestic violence.

And another from Australia: http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/when-an-avo-is-just-a-tactic-in-a-silly-argument

MassOutrage contains real-world practical information about what to do when you are being attacked in a Family or Juvenile Court by a state child protection agency such as the Dept. of Children and Families, by false allegations of abuse to get a restraining order, or by a divorce court which is not treating you fairly. This information will help you fight back, so that you can save your family and your children.

If you been hit with any of the three aspects of family law I call the “Iron Triangle”, 1) Restraining Orders or Orders of Protection; 2) Your state child protective services or Dept. of Children and Families (DCF); or 3) a Divorce/Paternity case, MassOutrage exposes their dirty tricks, and provides legal information on how to oppose them and win.

State courts and agencies war against families, and often convince family members to use restraining orders or the DCF agency as a weapon. If the person succumbs to the temptation, in order to get a leg up in court, he or she often ends up ruining not just the other parent, but the children as well.

Restraining orders or Orders of Protection are supposed to protect petitioners from abuse, but are often used for dumping a boyfriend, as a first strike in a divorce, or out of spite. Often no real abuse exists, but courts issue them much too easily, and a violation brings arrest and jail. A huge domestic abuse industry makes lots of money exploiting the problem.

Departments of Children and Families, called other names in different states, allegedly protect children from abuse and neglect. However, they often make allegations on flimsy evidence, do poor investigations, and take children from families wrongly, ruining them in the process. Over 500,000 children are in state custody at any one time in the United States.

Divorce and paternity cases often leave everyone broke, angry, and exhausted. Children need both parents, but courts often do not see it that way, despite their own policies to promote shared parenting. See, for example, this Massachusetts official court booklet called Planning for Shared Parenting. (click the title.)

This is a very brief overview of the problem. On this site, you will find detailed information analyzing each of these issues, reviewing the dirty tricks used by agencies and courts, and explaining exactly how to fight back and deal with the situation.

Attorney Gregory A. Hession prepared MassOutrage because so many clients have endured outrageous mistreatment at the hands of family and juvenile courts, or state child protective services. After 16 years of legal practice, he continually adds material that he learns to this web site, to help you fight your own case.

All of the available resources are set out in links on the right, which you can click to get to the information you want to study.

May you find needed help, encouragement and hope here, even when the battle is hard and long.

Print Friendly Page

The origins of the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai Brith

The ADL: An Angel Of Death

Remembering the Murder of Mary Phagan

By Mark Franklin

“Since [the ADL's] founding in 1913, you have been an angel on America’s shoulder, summing us to our highest ideas.” — Al Gore, May 9, 2000

THERE has been an angel on America’s shoulders since the ADL was founded in 1913, but it is not the ADL. Rather, it is Mary Phagan, a beautiful young girl.

You see, Mary Phagan is probably the reason for the ADL’s very existence. If you haven’t heard of her, it’s likely because it is the ADL’s dark, little secret — a secret so dark that they wish they could forget it. But it is still there, and forever will be; for it is a secret born in blood.

Back in the early 1900s, before the Jewish secret society B’nai B’rith (which means something like “Brotherhood of the Chosen” to its Hebrew membership) formed its sub-group, the ADL, there existed a Jewish man by the name of Leo Frank. Frank was president of a pencil company, where the child Mary Phagan worked, and also head of a chapter of B’nai B’rith.

Leo Frank murdered the young girl Mary Phagan. The ADL was formed shortly thereafter by B’nai B’rith. Many feel that the ADL’s purpose at the time was essentially damage control — to hide the fact that a prominent member of the Jewish occult murdered a Gentile child in cold blood.

The story is best expressed by John Carson. He wrote “The Ballad of Mary Phagan.” It goes like this:

Little Mary Phagan went to town one day, And went to the pencil factory to see the big parade. She left home at eleven, And kissed her mother goodbye, Not one time did the poor child think that she was going to die. Leo Frank met her, with a brutal heart we know, He smiled and said, “Little Mary, Now you will go home no more.” He sneaked along behind her, Till she reached the metal room, He laughed and said, “Little Mary, you have met your fatal doom.” She fell upon her knees, and to Leo Frank she pled, He took this stick from the trash pile And hit her across the head. The tears rolled down her rosy cheeks, While the blood flowed down her back, But still she remembered telling her mother What time she would be back. He killed little Mary Phagan — – it was on a holiday — And he called on Jim Conley to take her body away. He took her to the basement, She was bound hand and feet, And down in the basement little Mary lay asleep.

THAT is the ADL’s dark, little secret: B’nai B’rith chapter head Leo Frank was found guilty by a jury of the murder of little Mary Phagan. An objective book that researches the matter is called “The Murder of Little Mary Phagan,” which was written by a distant relative of Mary Phagan with the same name in 1987. (See www.addall.com if curious about it.) Because it is objective, most Jewish reviewers hate it, often frothing at the mouth when they hear its name and spewing lies to distort its attempt for truth.

Some believe that the young Mary Phagan’s murder may have been occult-related. It occurred about the same time a Russian court determined that Andrei Youshchinsky was murdered by Jews for occult purposes.

Youshchinsky’s murder was determined to have occurred in a synagogue located on a Jewish-owned brick company’s property that only employed Jews, though the Russian court could not determine who were the ones responsible, as many Jews from outlying areas had apparently participated in the ritual.

Menachem Mendel Beiliss was tried for the case, but the court could not determine for certain that he was the one who wielded the knife. He was found innocent after some unusual circumstances: Several witnesses either died of unnatural causes (two children were poisoned), were bribed (several people attested to money being offered them), or mysteriously vanished off the face of the earth before the trial. Jews now say that the court’s findings were wrong — that Youshchinsky’s murder was a mere frame-up and that Jews had nothing to do with it.

IN the Mary Phagan case, despite clear evidence, Jews also still clamor that Frank was innocent; that the court was wrong. They say that white southern racists convicted him because he was an innocent white Jew, and let the true guilty black man go free in order to persecute the white Jew. (Everyone knows how southern racist whites like to let free black child killers, just so that white Jews can be wrongly convicted of crimes? Such is the logic of the ADL.) Frank went through appeals and lost. In fact, the case was an open and shut one, with the evidence in the matter being overwhelming.

Nevertheless, Jewish supremacists in the ADL and elsewhere still say that he was wrongly convicted. They continue to put money in politicians’ pockets and others who will stand up for the child murderer Frank’s honor. Something like 70 years after the fact, they got a governor to pardon Frank (with the pardon expressly noting that it had nothing to do with his guilt).

In fact, one cannot be pardoned without having first committed a crime (Clinton will tell you that.) An old man desperate for some life-saving devices, who suddenly got the money for such (from whom?), suddenly “remembered” things and tried to vindicate Frank something like 70 years after the fact.

Yet, the cold hard facts are still there: B’nai B’rith chapter head and Jewish occult member Leo Frank murdered the little Gentile girl Mary Phagan. And the ADL’s purpose at the time, as many today feel, was simply damage control and hiding this terrible fact.

This is the terrible truth of the ADL’s birth, a birth made in blood.

Print Friendly Page

From: http://www.unhcr.no/Pdf/Baltic_nordic_HL_2011/May_2011.pdf

“A report released by the (Oslo) police on Wednesday states that all assault rapes during last year were committed by men with a non-Western origin. All the reported rapes during the last 5 years are done by men with a foreign origin. Police inspector Hanne Kristin Rodhe says the perpetrators often are unemployed, have been asylum-seekers during the last five years and come from a traumatized environment. She adds that their perception of women can be one of the motives behind the rapes.”

Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt said on his Blog:
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/all_rapes_in_oslo_by_foreigners_police

“Australia has not reported any such marked pattern.”

So I asked in his Comments section: (which would be refused publication in the Adelaide Advertiser or the Punch because us recalcitrant racists are not permitted to question society or the social, racial and political agendas of those whom we are supposed to think of as our betters …)

Could that be because Australia refuses to track or just refuses to publish race based crime statistics? What I do know is that most of the time when talking about society in general, the statistics typically speak of foreign born Australians and Australian residents along with those born in Australia of foreign born parents compared with those of families consisting of two or more generations born in Australia, and Australian Indigenous people.

This all boils down to:
New Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Settled Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Indigenous Australians (who thanks to today’s laws and variable statistics are also often of an indeterminate race, religion and origin).

My question is: are we just PC fools burying our heads in the sand by accepting the refusal of government bodies to release accurate statistical data comparable to accumulated statistics from overseas? Or are we the most racially harmonious nation on Earth like we are constantly told? Or is it too racist to ask for clarification?

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA

Statistics from the FBI Website

http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/2009hatecrimestats_112210

Hate Crime Statistics, 2009, includes the following information:

Of the 6,598 single-bias incidents, 48.5 percent were motivated by a racial bias, 19.7 percent were motivated by a religious bias, 18.5 percent were motivated by a sexual-orientation bias, and 11.8 percent were motivated by an ethnicity/national origin bias. Bias against a disability accounted for 1.5 percent of single-bias incidents.

There were 4,793 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against persons in 2009. Intimidation accounted for 45.0 percent of crimes against persons, simple assaults for 35.3 percent, and aggravated assaults for 19.1 percent. Other offenses, including nine forcible rapes and eight murders, accounted for the remainder.

There were 2,970 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against property; most of these (83.0 percent) were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism. The remaining 17.0 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other offenses.

An analysis of data for single-bias hate crime incident victims revealed that 48.8 percent were targeted because of the offender’s bias against a race, 18.9 percent because of a bias against a religious belief, 17.8 percent because of a sexual orientation bias, 13.3 percent because of an ethnicity/national origin bias, and 1.2 percent because of a disability bias.
Of the 6,225 known offenders, 62.4 percent were white, 18.5 percent were black, 7.3 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group), 1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 0.7 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander. The race was unknown for the remaining known offenders.

The largest percentage (31.3 percent) of hate crime incidents occurred in or near homes. In addition, 17.2 percent took place on highways, roads, alleys, or streets; 11.4 percent happened at schools or colleges; 6.1 percent in parking lots or garages; and 4.3 percent in churches, synagogues, or temples. The remaining 29.7 percent of hate crime incidents took place at other specified locations, multiple locations, or other/unknown locations.

For statistical purposes, the US Government’s Department of Justice considers there to be only four different races: Black, Asian, Native American and White. Those classed as White by the DOJ include Europeans as well as Arabs, Jews and Mestizos (Mexican, Central and South Americans of mixed or native ancestry).

He sure as hell doesn’t think he’s White. Why should we?

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page

A media ideologist rightfully takes the Federal Government to task in its poor choice of street corner doom-sayers, but takes the opportunity to marginalise anyone that disagrees with his own extremist the Earth is doomed stance.

Forget Cate when it comes to climate

Adam Ferrier | The Australian | May 30, 2011

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/forget-cate-when-it-comes-to-climate/story-fn59niix-1226065155258

Extract: “Apart from some on the lunatic fringe everyone has already said yes – more or less. Yes, we all agree there is an issue with climate change, and yes we would like to do something about it.”

Yes, you are an advertising guru that is 100% right on the reasons not to use Cate Blanchett for the campaign, but you are on the lunatic fringe that says let’s disregard history and only take into account weather stats since 1900 or so. The reality is very different to what those in your fringe camp think. The average person will accept anything, right or wrong if it does not interfere with their beer, TV and football, but will scrutinise everything to the infinite degree if it even threatens to interfere with their beer, TV and football – of that at least we can agree. But do not make the mistake of confusing the laissez-faire attitude of the average Australian as acceptance of man made climate change, and inquiry into the whys and wherefores of political exploitation as proof people are part of a lunatic (supposedly denialist) fringe, because it is sweeping statements like that which reveal to anyone capable of reading it, that you are talking from the lunatic (warmist) fringe.

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA.

Print Friendly Page

AAP: Adelaide Advertiser | May 5, 2011

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/indians-may-fill-resources-skills-gap/story-e6frea7c-1226050272001

TENS of thousands of Indian graduates could be trained to Australian standards in a bid to plug the gap in Australia’s booming resources sector.

A Skills Australia report earlier this week said Australia would need 2.4 million extra skilled workers in the next four years to meet the demands of the mining boom.

Forget importing more bloody Indians. Train 2.4 million unemployed Australians instead.

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page