Entries in the 'State Governments' Category

Anti-Bikie Laws Already Used Against Non-Bike Riding Folk

Yes, the title says it all. You don’t need to ride a motorcycle, be part of an outlaw motorcycle club, or even have the merest hint of association with a biker for you too be targeted under the so-called “Anti-Bikie Laws.”

 

From Luke McKee/MCKEELUKELEDGERD:

[NSW law] 60C Was introduced because of “motocycle gangs” and the new police powers have only been used on 3 people according to The NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR). YES [u]only 3 people have accused of this crime, and I’m the only one after it was upgraded to 5 years jail in the 2006 gang laws bill that was prompted as a knee-jerk reaction to the Cronulla riots[/u]. Those gang laws make CCTV to protect your own home illegal if it’s argued you don’t like corrupt elements of NSW Police that threaten your family.

http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/audio/nsw-gang-laws-already-exist-being-used-against-non-gang-members

 

Australia, don’t make yourself an easy target, fight back against these Stalinist laws now, or tomorrow may be to late.

I’M AGAINST THE ANTI-BIKIE LEGISLATION: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=62465907886&ref=mf

Cailen.

New ‘thoughtcrime’ laws for Australia

New laws may counter racist attacks

Michael Harvey: Herald Sun | June 19, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25657370-661,00.html

VICIOUS attacks against Indian students have prompted the Rudd Government to consider a legal crackdown on hate-mongers.

Investigations have started into creating a specific offence of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of race.

While state assault laws already deal with thugs who personally commit attacks, the potential federal changes would focus, for example, on those responsible for sending SMS messages that urge acts of violence on individuals.

Existing sedition provisions of counter-terrorism laws cover incitement on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity – but only against groups, not individuals.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland has raised the prospect of redressing the balance in response to the alarming spate of assaults on Indians in Melbourne.

This would be achieved by bringing forward a key part of the Government’s review of counter-terrorism laws.

In comments to Parliament this week, Mr McClelland said the Government was in the processing of responding to Law Reform Commission recommendations to change sedition laws.

“Currently there is at the federal level, as you would be aware, an offence of inciting violence against a group of individuals on the basis of their race, religion or ethnicity,” he said.

“As part of a response to recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission, the Government is examining the possibility of amending that offence to include a criterion of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of that individual’s race, religion, ethnicity or nationality.”

In 2006, the commission recommended alterations including changing the offence’s title from sedition to “urging violence” and repealing obsolete provisions.

The Brumby Government moved this month for judges to take hatred – motivated by race, religion, gender or sexual orientation – into account as an aggravating factor when considering sentences.

Comment:
The following comment was submitted to the editors of the Herald Sun.

This is thoughtcrime law where a simple smack in the teeth and a deliberately false report of a racial slur will gain you a longer prison sentence than a psycho who gets their jollies brutally bashing another almost to death. To make matters worse, just like existing State and Federal Racial Vilification Laws, this law will not be used to protect all people, but will be used as a wedge placing the protected “minorities” on one side of the fence and unprotected White Australians living in fear of false accusations on the other. But then, what would you expect from governments that approve of legislation allowing discrimination against White heterosexual males in the workplace?

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park, SA.

Australia to Protect Indian Students from Evil Racists – ROTFLMWAO!

We will protect Indian students: Smith

The Advertiser | May 31, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25564486-5005962,00.html

FOREIGN Minister Stephen Smith says Australia is doing all it can to prevent more attacks on Indian students.

They include two stabbings in Melbourne last week that have left one man fighting for his life in hospital.

Indian authorities believe there’s a racial element at work.

Mr Smith told Network Ten the government is working with the Indian community in Australia and India as well as state authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice and to ensure a safe environment for all international students.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has discussed the problem with Indian Prime Mininster Manmohan Singh.

The discussions come as more than a thousand members of Victoria’s Indian population marched along Melbourne’s main street to protest against the rising number of violent attacks against its community.

The protesters chanted and cheered as they marched down Swanston Street in the city centre.
Commuters had their journeys interrupted as trams were delayed while as the group made its way towards Parliament House.

The Federation of Indian Students of Australia says an increasing number of Indian students are being attacked in what it says are hate crimes.

Related:
Indian students block Melbourne traffic
18 arrests amid Indian protest over Melbourne race violence
Indian students abandon Flinders Street protest
Police ‘punched’ Indian protesters
Kill claim in racism storm


Comment:

One little, two little, three little Indians
Four little, five little, six little Indians
Seven little, eight little, nine little Indians
Ten little Indian boys.
Ten little, nine little, eight little Indians
Seven little, six little, five little Indians
Four little, three little, two little Indians
One little Indian boy.
And then there were None!

As per usual, the media and general public are going crazy accusing every second White Australian of being an evil Indian stabbing, Mexican hating racist. As much as I’d like it to be true, it’s not. The Mexican in question, Sol Trujillo, is the former head of Telstra (Australian Telecom). As such, he’s hated for his role as the chief of that company, not for being a Spic.

The Indians are different. They are hated simply for being Indians; yet oddly enough, it’s not White Australians that hate them, it’s imported Black Africans, Middle Easterners and just about every Muslim.

One might think that the Indian “students” are temporary visitors that we have to ensure the safety of at all costs. However, whether they are currently students or not, they are just another load of imported Australians who after their graduation from the halls of “higher learning” will remain in Australia as permanent residents.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that along with the Indians we are importing, we are importing their own racial and religious problems into Australia. Muslims: Africans and Arabs. Even if the Africans and Arabs are Christian or atheist, they still take the side of the most militant of their racial cultures – and that is the Muslim.

How do I know this? It’s been happening for several years now. Each time the media and government decry the behaviour of “Australian racists,” but just sometimes the truth slips through.

Last year in Adelaide, there were a string of racially motivated attacks against Indian university students. The Indian community themselves declared it to be attacks from the Lebanese community.

At roughly the same time in Melbourne, the attacks on Indian students were by Black Africans. See:
http://sacreator.com/blog/2008/09/13/african-youth-gangs-assault-indian-taxi-drivers

And so we know where to lay the blame for the violence – but will anything be done about it? No. To do what the Indian community wants and charge the perpetrators with a “hate crime” will never happen because the perpetrators are not White. However, if a White man such as myself gets into a scuffle with an Indian, you can bet your gonads that he will be charged with a “hate crime” – even if only to set an example for other White racists and to pander to the multicultural community.

How do we end these attacks? Ship them home. The Africans, the Indians, the Arabs and their Jewish pals, and the Asians. Then we can decide who can come into this country and study.

I for one know that as well as our streets being safer, the quality of the students will also greatly increase – mainly because they wont be using the university system as a back door to permanent residency in Australia.

Cailen.

Update – June 1, 2009: Worried parents call student back from Aus

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Worried-parents-call-student-back-from-Aus/articleshow/4601485.cms

GURGAON/NEW DELHI: Last September, 19-year-old Mukul Khanna had gone to Macquarie University, Sydney, all excited about finishing his BBA there and then probably settling in Australia. Less than a year later, he has returned to his Gurgaon home, called back by parents who hit the panic button after a friend of his was bashed up in Sydney two weeks back.

Sitting in his DLF Phase-V home, Dinesh Khanna, Mukul’s hotelier father tells TOI: “I know my son will now have to drop a year because he won’t get admission anywhere. But I am relieved that he is away from that madness.”

Mukul though says that fear among the Indian student population in Sydney, Melbourne and other cities is on the rise. “They target all Asian students including Pakistani and Sri Lankans. A lot of my Pakistani friends have left the place after being brutally attacked and robbed. Interestingly, the attackers are mostly not locals and are themselves people of foreign origin who resent the fact that Indian students go there in large numbers and take up jobs which may otherwise have gone to them.”

Hospital removes crosses from chapel

News Limited | April 08, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,25309064-29277,00.html?from=public_rss

http://mosman-daily.whereilive.com.au/news/story/the-chapel-without-a-crucifix

CRUCIFIXES, Bibles and all other Christian symbols have been banned from a hospital’s chapel when it is not being used for a church service.

The Mosman Daily has learnt that Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney has bes been ordered to remove Christian content by New South Wales bureaucrats to avoid offending Muslims, Hindus or other non-Christian believers who may want to pray in the chapel.

Hospital staff say that while the chapel was built for Christians, they now want the chapel to be completely non-denominational.

An inspection of the chapel last week by the Daily found no trace of a crucifix or any other religious symbol inside the chapel.

The Daily has been told that church leaders must bring their own symbols to use in a service.

The chapel building also contains a separate Muslim prayer room. [more ...]


Comment:
I am in two frames of mind about this.

The first is that I recognise that to the Christians, their chapel was holy ground. It’s only Muslim and Jewish influences that have caused the New South Wales state government to order the removal of Christian icons from the hospital chapel. Really, if these people with their primitive religions don’t like this country, they can go back to whence they came. But then, with their standard belief of “Love thy enemy,” and Christians not having the balls to take back what is rightfully theirs, they get what they deserve.

On the other hand, never being a Christian, I’d say bulldoze the place. It’s a waste of space. Hospitals are places of science. If you want to go talk to your imaginary friends, go to the psychiatric ward where you’ll find more of your kind.

To Creators reading this. If you are ever in Mosman hospital for a period of time, take the time to give a serman or two from the White Man’s Bible. If they refuse to permit reading from our holy books, sue the bastards!

Cailen.

Victorian Government Plans to Discriminate Against White Males

Discrimination against white males will soon be encouraged

Susie O’Brien: Herald Sun | December 09, 2008

DISCRIMINATION against dominant white males will soon be encouraged in a bid to boost the status of women, the disabled and cultural and religious minorities.

Such positive discrimination — treating people differently in order to obtain equality for marginalised groups – is set to be legalised under planned changes to the Equal Opportunity Act foreshadowed last week by state Attorney-General Rob Hulls.

The laws are also expected to protect the rights of people with criminal records to get a job, as long as their past misdeeds are irrelevant to work being sought.

Equal Opportunity Commission CEO Dr Helen Szoke said males had “been the big success story in business and goods and services”.

“Clearly, they will have their position changed because they will be competing in a different way with these people who have been traditionally marginalised,” she said.

“Let’s open it up so everyone can have a fair go.”

Victoria’s peak business body expressed concern yesterday about the need for the proposed laws, and questioned if they would undermine the right of companies to make legitimate business decisions.

At present, individuals or bodies wanting to single out any race or gender for special treatment must gain an exemption from VCAT. [more ...]


Comment:
Left the following comment on the above article’s comments page – I was expecting them to reject it but it’s there as comment #57 of 173.

If they change the laws allowing employers to discriminate against White males, they had better change assault laws too because I will spit in the employer’s face when he or she discriminates against me. If anyone thinks I wouldn’t, I did the same 25 years ago when refused a job because I was not Vietnamese. These days I would pursue my rights under current legislation – but if those rights were to be taken from me, spitting in the face of a discriminating employer would become an option again.

Since this is my own blog, let me go further on this and clarify a few things. Spitting in the face of an anti-White racist employer would only be a start. A smack in the teeth is the logical escalation of violent tactics that would ensue culminating in arson and the eventual murder of White hating, racist employers and government officials.

The average White Australian male is very sensitive when it comes to his own personal wants and needs, and employment in a “fair go” environment is at the very centre of everything he strives for. The removal of equal opportunity employment in favour of sexual and racial minority agendas strikes at his very core, and he will not tolerate it.

If this law comes to pass in Victoria (and elsewhere), you can be your balls there will be violence – and it’s your balls that will be on the line.

That is what we Creators call RAHOWA!

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park.