From: http://www.unhcr.no/Pdf/Baltic_nordic_HL_2011/May_2011.pdf

“A report released by the (Oslo) police on Wednesday states that all assault rapes during last year were committed by men with a non-Western origin. All the reported rapes during the last 5 years are done by men with a foreign origin. Police inspector Hanne Kristin Rodhe says the perpetrators often are unemployed, have been asylum-seekers during the last five years and come from a traumatized environment. She adds that their perception of women can be one of the motives behind the rapes.”

Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt said on his Blog:
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/all_rapes_in_oslo_by_foreigners_police

“Australia has not reported any such marked pattern.”

So I asked in his Comments section: (which is guaranteed refused publication in the Adelaide Advertiser or the Punch because us recalcitrant “racists” are not permitted to question society or the social, racial and political agendas of those whom we are supposed to think of as our betters …)

Could that be because Australia refuses to track or just refuses to publish race based crime statistics? What I do know is that most of the time when talking about society in general, the statistics typically speak of foreign born Australians and Australian residents along with those born in Australia of foreign born parents compared with those of families consisting of two or more generations born in Australia, and Australian Indigenous people.

This all boils down to:
New Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Settled Australians (of indeterminate race, religion or origin).
Indigenous Australians (who thanks to today’s laws and variable statistics are also often of an indeterminate race, religion and origin).

My question is: are we just PC fools burying our heads in the sand by accepting the refusal of government bodies to release accurate statistical data comparable to accumulated statistics from overseas? Or are we the most racially harmonious nation on Earth like we are constantly told? Or is it too racist to ask for clarification?

Cailen Cambeul of Adelaide, SA

Statistics from the FBI Website

http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/2009hatecrimestats_112210

Hate Crime Statistics, 2009, includes the following information:

Of the 6,598 single-bias incidents, 48.5 percent were motivated by a racial bias, 19.7 percent were motivated by a religious bias, 18.5 percent were motivated by a sexual-orientation bias, and 11.8 percent were motivated by an ethnicity/national origin bias. Bias against a disability accounted for 1.5 percent of single-bias incidents.

There were 4,793 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against persons in 2009. Intimidation accounted for 45.0 percent of crimes against persons, simple assaults for 35.3 percent, and aggravated assaults for 19.1 percent. Other offenses, including nine forcible rapes and eight murders, accounted for the remainder.

There were 2,970 hate crime offenses classified as crimes against property; most of these (83.0 percent) were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism. The remaining 17.0 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other offenses.

An analysis of data for single-bias hate crime incident victims revealed that 48.8 percent were targeted because of the offender’s bias against a race, 18.9 percent because of a bias against a religious belief, 17.8 percent because of a sexual orientation bias, 13.3 percent because of an ethnicity/national origin bias, and 1.2 percent because of a disability bias.
Of the 6,225 known offenders, 62.4 percent were white, 18.5 percent were black, 7.3 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group), 1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 0.7 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander. The race was unknown for the remaining known offenders.

The largest percentage (31.3 percent) of hate crime incidents occurred in or near homes. In addition, 17.2 percent took place on highways, roads, alleys, or streets; 11.4 percent happened at schools or colleges; 6.1 percent in parking lots or garages; and 4.3 percent in churches, synagogues, or temples. The remaining 29.7 percent of hate crime incidents took place at other specified locations, multiple locations, or other/unknown locations.

For statistical purposes, the US Government’s Department of Justice considers there to be only four different races: Black, Asian, Native American and White. Those classed as White by the DOJ include Europeans as well as Arabs, Jews and Mestizos (Mexican, Central and South Americans of mixed or native ancestry).

He sure as hell doesn’t think he’s White. Why should we?

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page

Pauline Hanson is back in politics and as per usual, the Australian Labor Party are crying “RACIST!”

“I want to make unequivocally clear that the NSW Labor Party will have no preferences for Ms Hanson,” Premier Kristina Keneally told Fairfax Radio Network.

“We absolutely condemn the sorts of racist and discriminatory policies which come from Ms Hanson and parties like One Nation.”
Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott isn’t doing much better by allowing Ms Hanson to be referred to as a “serial pest” during his own interview, but at least he did say that as an Australilan citizen she has a right to stand for election. But then, Abbott being the one ultimately responsible for Ms Hanson’s false imprisonment no doubt has his own plans on how to make use of and crush Ms Hanson.

Meanwhile the media in its support of the destruction of the Australian way of life continue to run out the tired old accusations of racist, gaol-bird (they mention that she was found guilty of electoral fraud but conveniently neglect to mention that the conviction was overturned), political profiteer (according to the media Ms Hanson only goes into politics planning to deliberately lose the election while walking away with a tidy wad of cash in her purse – while no other Independent or big party poli has even thought of doing the same), and of course that Ms Hanson once owned a fish and chip shop (as if politics should be left to university trained Fabians/Marxists like Ju-liar Gillard and the common person should know and keep to their place in society).

Ms Hanson hit back at Premier Keneally’s comments, telling Fairfax Radio Network: “I’m not racist.”

“No-one can ever comment or make a comment on any racist statement I have ever said,” she said today.

“I have … as an Australian … a right to question immigration and multiculturalism, which I don’t believe is helping our country.

“I believe in people coming here, assimilating, becoming Australians and be proud of this country and abide by the laws of the land.”

Ms Hanson said the major political parties feared her.

“Why? Because they know I’ve always spoken out, I expose them for what they are,” she said.

“They want to hold onto their power and the positions.

“It is in the people’s interest of NSW to ensure that I am on the floor of NSW.”

Ms Hanson is correct; she is not a racist. What Ms Hanson is, is best defined as a multi-racial nationalist. That is, she believes in equality for all races combined with a passionate belief that Australia as a nation and Australian culture is not only worthy of maintaining in its current form, but is also worthy of the highest possible praise and every Australian should have the right to feel proud of the history of their island nation. After all, was it not Ms Hanson that some years ago happily sang “I am, you are, we are Australian” with a little Aboriginal girl? If you want to understand the real Pauline Hanson, ignore the media, listen to the lady and read her maiden speech in parliament, which I have included below.

Cailen.

Here are the news links – if it can really be called news. I suggest skimming through or even skipping the actual articles and reading the comments. That’s where the real news is.

Newcastle Herald: Pauline Hanson on group ticket
Daily Telegraph: Pauline Hanson eyes Upper House seat
News.com: Pauline Hanson eyes Upper House seat in NSW state election
Adelaide Advertiser: Pauline Hanson’s political comeback turns nasty
Herald Sun: Pauline Hanson nominates for NSW Upper House in new run for politics

Pauline Hanson’s Maiden Speech in Federal Parliament
Tuesday, 10th September 1996.
“Mr Acting Speaker, in making my first speech in this place, I congratulate you on your election and wish to say how proud I am to be here as the Independent member for Oxley. I come here not as a polished politician but as a woman who has had her fair share of life’s knocks.

My view on issues is based on commonsense, and my experience as a mother of four children, as a sole parent, and as a businesswoman running a fish and chip shop. I won the seat of Oxley largely on an issue that has resulted in me being called a racist. That issue related to my comment that Aboriginals received more benefits than non-Aboriginals.

We now have a situation where a type of reverse racism is applied to mainstream Australians by those who promote political correctness and those who control the various taxpayer funded `industries’ that flourish in our society servicing Aboriginals, multiculturalists and a host of other minority groups. In response to my call for equality for all Australians, the most noisy criticism came from the fat cats, bureaucrats and the do- gooders. They screamed the loudest because they stand to lose the most–their power, money and position, all funded by ordinary Australian taxpayers.

Present governments are encouraging separatism in Australia by providing opportunities, land, moneys and facilities available only to Aboriginals. Along with millions of Australians, I am fed up to the back teeth with the inequalities that are being promoted by the government and paid for by the taxpayer under the assumption that Aboriginals are the most disadvantaged people in Australia. I do not believe that the colour of one’s skin determines whether you are disadvantaged. As Paul Hasluck said in parliament in October 1955 when he was Minister for Territories:

The distinction I make is this. A social problem is one that concerns the way in which people live together in one society. A racial problem is a problem which confronts two different races who live in two separate societies, even if those societies are side by side. We do not want a society in Australia in which one group enjoy one set of privileges >and another group enjoy another set of privileges.

Has luck’s vision was of a single society in which racial emphases were rejected and social issues addressed. I totally agree with him, and so would the majority of Australians.

But, remember, when he gave his speech he was talking about the privileges that white Australians were seen to be enjoying over Aboriginals. Today, 41 years later, I talk about the exact opposite–the privileges Aboriginals enjoy over other Australians. I have done research on benefits available only to Aboriginals and challenge anyone to tell me how Aboriginals are disadvantaged when they can obtain three and five per cent housing loans denied to non-Aboriginals.

This nation is being divided into black and white, and the present system encourages this. I am fed up with being told, `This is our land.’ Well, where the hell do I go? I was born here, and so were my parents and children. I will work beside anyone and they will be my equal but I draw the line when told I must pay and continue paying for something that happened over 200 years ago. Like most Australians, I worked for my land; no-one gave it to me.

Apart from the $40 million spent so far since Mabo on native title claims, the government has made available $1 billion for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as compensation for land they cannot claim under native title. Bear in mind that the $40 million spent so far in native title has gone into the pockets of grateful lawyers and consultants. Not one native title has been granted as I speak.

The majority of Aboriginals do not want handouts because they realise that welfare is killing them. This quote says it all: “If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day. If you teach him how to fish you feed him for a lifetime.”

Those who feed off the Aboriginal industry do not want to see things changed. Look at the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. Members receive $290 a day sitting allowance and $320 a day travelling allowance, and most of these people also hold other very well paid positions. No wonder they did not want to resign recently!

Reconciliation is everyone recognising and treating each other as equals, and everyone must be responsible for their own actions. This is why I am calling for ATSIC to be abolished. It is a failed, hypocritical and discriminatory organisation that has failed dismally the people it was meant to serve. It will take more than Senator Herron’s surgical skills to correct the terminal mess it is in. Anyone with a criminal record can, and does, hold a position with ATSIC. I cannot hold my position as a politician if I have a criminal record–once again, two sets of rules.

If politicians continue to promote separatism in Australia, they should not continue to hold their seats in this parliament. They are not truly representing all Australians, and I call on the people to throw them out. To survive in peace and harmony, united and strong, we must have one people, one nation, one flag.

The greatest cause of family breakdown is unemployment. This country of ours has the richest mineral deposits in the world and vast rich lands for agriculture and is surrounded by oceans that provide a wealth of seafood, and yet we are $190 billion in debt with an interest bill that is strangling us.

Youth unemployment between the ages of 15 to 24 runs at 25 per cent and is even higher in my electorate of Oxley. Statistics, by cooking the books, say that Australia’s unemployment is at 8.6 per cent, or just under one million people. If we disregard that one hour’s work a week classifies a person as employed, then the figure is really between 1.5 million and 1.9 million unemployed. This is a crisis that recent governments have ignored because of a lack of will. We are regarded as a Third World country with First World living conditions. We have one of the highest interest rates in the world, and we owe more money per capita than any other country. All we need is a nail hole in the bottom of the boat and we’re sunk.

In real dollar terms, our standard of living has dropped over the past 10 years. In the 1960s, our wages increase ran at three per cent and unemployment at two per cent. Today, not only is there no wage increase, we have gone backwards and unemployment is officially 8.6 per cent. The real figure must be close to 12 to 13 per cent.

I wish to comment briefly on some social and legal problems encountered by many of my constituents– problems not restricted to just my electorate of Oxley. I refer to the social and family upheaval created by the Family Law Act and the ramifications of that act embodied in the child support scheme. The Family Law Act, which was the child of the disgraceful Senator Lionel Murphy, should be repealed. It has brought death, misery and heartache to countless thousands of Australians. Children are treated like pawns in some crazy game of chess.

The child support scheme has become unworkable, very unfair and one sided. Custodial parents can often profit handsomely at the expense of a parent paying child support, and in many cases the non-custodial parent simply gives up employment to escape the, in many cases, heavy and punitive financial demands. Governments must give to all those who have hit life’s hurdles the chance to rebuild and have a future.

We have lost all our big Australian industries and icons, including Qantas when it sold 25 per cent of its shares and a controlling interest to British Airways. Now this government wants to sell Telstra, a company that made a $1.2 billion profit last year and will make a $2 billion profit this year. But, first, they want to sack 54,000 employees to show better profits and share prices. Anyone with business sense knows that you do not sell off your assets especially when they are making money. I may be only `a fish and chip shop lady’, but some of these economists need to get their heads out of the textbooks and get a job in the real world. I would not even let one of them handle my grocery shopping.

Immigration and multiculturalism are issues that this government is trying to address, but for far too long ordinary Australians have been kept out of any debate by the major parties. I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished. I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians. Between 1984 and 1995, 40 per cent of all migrants coming into this country were of Asian origin. They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate. Of course, I will be called racist but, if I can invite whom I want into my home, then I should have the right to have a say in who comes into my country. A truly multicultural country can never be strong or united. The world is full of failed and tragic examples, ranging from Ireland to Bosnia to Africa and, closer to home, Papua New Guinea. America and Great Britain are currently paying the price.

Arthur Calwell was a great Australian and Labor leader, and it is a pity that there are not men of his stature sitting on the opposition benches today. Arthur Calwell said:

Japan, India, Burma, Ceylon and every new African nation are fiercely anti-white and anti one another. Do we want or need any of these people here? I am one red-blooded Australian who says no and who speaks for 90% of Australians.

I have no hesitation in echoing the words of Arthur Calwell.

There is light at the end of the tunnel and there are solutions. If this government wants to be fair dinkum, then it must stop kowtowing to financial markets, international organisations, world bankers, investment companies and big business people. The Howard government must become visionary and be prepared to act, even at the risk of making mistakes.

In this financial year we will be spending at least $1.5 billion on foreign aid and we cannot be sure that this money will be properly spent, as corruption and mismanagement in many of the recipient countries are legend. Australia must review its membership and funding of the UN, as it is a little like ATSIC on a grander scale, with huge tax-free American dollar salaries, duty-free luxury cars and diplomatic status.

The World Health Organisation has a lot of its medical experts sitting in Geneva while hospitals in Africa have no drugs and desperate patients are forced to seek medication on the black market. I am going to find out how many treaties we have signed with the UN, have them exposed and then call for their repudiation. The government should cease all foreign aid immediately and apply the savings to generate employment here at home.

Abolishing the policy of multiculturalism will save billions of dollars and allow those from ethnic backgrounds to join mainstream Australia, paving the way to a strong, united country. Immigration must be halted in the short-term so that our dole queues are not added to by, in many cases, unskilled migrants not fluent in the English language. This would be one positive step to rescue many young and older Australians from a predicament which has become a national disgrace and crisis. I must stress at this stage that I do not consider those people from ethnic backgrounds currently living in Australia anything but first-class citizens, provided of course that they give this country their full, undivided loyalty.

The government must be imaginative enough to become involved, in the short-term at least, in job creating projects that will help establish the foundation for a resurgence of national development and enterprise. Such schemes would be the building of the Alice Springs to Darwin railway line, new roads and ports, water conservation, reafforestation and other sensible and practical environmental projects.

Therefore I call for the introduction of national service for a period of 12 months, compulsory for males and females upon finishing year 12 or reaching 18 years of age. This could be a civil service with a touch of military training, because I do not feel we can go on living in a dream world forever and a day believing that war will never touch our lives again.

The government must do all it can to help reduce interest rates for business. How can we compete with Japan, Germany and Singapore, who enjoy rates of two per cent, 5.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent respectively? Reduced tariffs on foreign goods that compete with local products seem only to cost Australians their jobs. We must look after our own before lining the pockets of overseas countries and investors at the expense of our living standards and future.

Mr Acting Speaker, time is running out. We may have only 10 to 15 years left to turn things around. Because of our resources and our position in the world, we will not have a say because neighbouring countries such as Japan, with 125 million people; China, with 1.2 billion people; India, with 846 million people; Indonesia, with 178 million people; and Malaysia, with 20 million people are well aware of our resources and potential. Wake up, Australia, before it is too late. Australians need and want leaders who can inspire and give hope in difficult times. Now is the time for the Howard government to accept the challenge.

Mr Acting Speaker, everything I have said is relevant to my electorate of Oxley, which is typical of mainstream Australia. I do have concerns for my country and I am going to do my best to speak my mind and stand up for what I believe in. As an independent I am confident that I can look after the needs of the people of Oxley and I will always be guided by their advice. It is refreshing to be able to express my views without having to toe a party line. It has got me into trouble on the odd occasion, but I am not going to stop saying what I think. I consider myself just an ordinary Australian who wants to keep this great country strong and independent, and my greatest desire is to see all Australians treat each other as equals as we travel together towards the new century.

I will fight hard to keep my seat in this place, but that will depend on the people who sent me here. Mr Acting Speaker, I thank you for your attention and trust that you will not think me presumptuous if I dedicate this speech to the people of Oxley and those Australians who have supported me. I salute them all.” – Pauline Hanson.

Print Friendly Page

Michael Harvey: Herald Sun | June 19, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25657370-661,00.html

VICIOUS attacks against Indian students have prompted the Rudd Government to consider a legal crackdown on hate-mongers.

Investigations have started into creating a specific offence of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of race.

While state assault laws already deal with thugs who personally commit attacks, the potential federal changes would focus, for example, on those responsible for sending SMS messages that urge acts of violence on individuals.

Existing sedition provisions of counter-terrorism laws cover incitement on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity – but only against groups, not individuals.

Attorney-General Robert McClelland has raised the prospect of redressing the balance in response to the alarming spate of assaults on Indians in Melbourne.

This would be achieved by bringing forward a key part of the Government’s review of counter-terrorism laws.

In comments to Parliament this week, Mr McClelland said the Government was in the processing of responding to Law Reform Commission recommendations to change sedition laws.

“Currently there is at the federal level, as you would be aware, an offence of inciting violence against a group of individuals on the basis of their race, religion or ethnicity,” he said.

“As part of a response to recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission, the Government is examining the possibility of amending that offence to include a criterion of inciting violence against an individual on the basis of that individual’s race, religion, ethnicity or nationality.”

In 2006, the commission recommended alterations including changing the offence’s title from sedition to “urging violence” and repealing obsolete provisions.

The Brumby Government moved this month for judges to take hatred – motivated by race, religion, gender or sexual orientation – into account as an aggravating factor when considering sentences.

Comment:
The following comment was submitted to the editors of the Herald Sun.

This is thoughtcrime law where a simple smack in the teeth and a deliberately false report of a racial slur will gain you a longer prison sentence than a psycho who gets their jollies brutally bashing another almost to death. To make matters worse, just like existing State and Federal Racial Vilification Laws, this law will not be used to protect all people, but will be used as a wedge placing the protected “minorities” on one side of the fence and unprotected White Australians living in fear of false accusations on the other. But then, what would you expect from governments that approve of legislation allowing discrimination against White heterosexual males in the workplace?

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park, SA.

Print Friendly Page

The Advertiser | May 31, 2009

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25564486-5005962,00.html

FOREIGN Minister Stephen Smith says Australia is doing all it can to prevent more attacks on Indian students.

They include two stabbings in Melbourne last week that have left one man fighting for his life in hospital.

Indian authorities believe there’s a racial element at work.

Mr Smith told Network Ten the government is working with the Indian community in Australia and India as well as state authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice and to ensure a safe environment for all international students.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has discussed the problem with Indian Prime Mininster Manmohan Singh.

The discussions come as more than a thousand members of Victoria’s Indian population marched along Melbourne’s main street to protest against the rising number of violent attacks against its community.

The protesters chanted and cheered as they marched down Swanston Street in the city centre.
Commuters had their journeys interrupted as trams were delayed while as the group made its way towards Parliament House.

The Federation of Indian Students of Australia says an increasing number of Indian students are being attacked in what it says are hate crimes.

Related:
Indian students block Melbourne traffic
18 arrests amid Indian protest over Melbourne race violence
Indian students abandon Flinders Street protest
Police ‘punched’ Indian protesters
Kill claim in racism storm

One little, two little, three little Indians
Four little, five little, six little Indians
Seven little, eight little, nine little Indians
Ten little Indian boys.
Ten little, nine little, eight little Indians
Seven little, six little, five little Indians
Four little, three little, two little Indians
One little Indian boy.
And then there were None!

As per usual, the media and general public are going crazy accusing every second White Australian of being an evil Indian stabbing, Mexican hating racist. As much as I’d like it to be true, it’s not. The Mexican in question, Sol Trujillo, is the former head of Telstra (Australian Telecom). As such, he’s hated for his role as the chief of that company, not for being a Spic.

The Indians are different. They are hated simply for being Indians; yet oddly enough, it’s not White Australians that hate them, it’s imported Black Africans, Middle Easterners and just about every Muslim.

One might think that the Indian “students” are temporary visitors that we have to ensure the safety of at all costs. However, whether they are currently students or not, they are just another load of imported Australians who after their graduation from the halls of “higher learning” will remain in Australia as permanent residents.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that along with the Indians we are importing, we are importing their own racial and religious problems into Australia. Muslims: Africans and Arabs. Even if the Africans and Arabs are Christian or atheist, they still take the side of the most militant of their racial cultures – and that is the Muslim.

How do I know this? It’s been happening for several years now. Each time the media and government decry the behaviour of “Australian racists,” but just sometimes the truth slips through.

Last year in Adelaide, there were a string of racially motivated attacks against Indian university students. The Indian community themselves declared it to be attacks from the Lebanese community.

At roughly the same time in Melbourne, the attacks on Indian students were by Black Africans. See:
http://sacreator.com/blog/2008/09/13/african-youth-gangs-assault-indian-taxi-drivers

And so we know where to lay the blame for the violence – but will anything be done about it? No. To do what the Indian community wants and charge the perpetrators with a “hate crime” will never happen because the perpetrators are not White. However, if a White man such as myself gets into a scuffle with an Indian, you can bet your gonads that he will be charged with a “hate crime” – even if only to set an example for other White racists and to pander to the multicultural community.

How do we end these attacks? Ship them home. The Africans, the Indians, the Arabs and their Jewish pals, and the Asians. Then we can decide who can come into this country and study.

I for one know that as well as our streets being safer, the quality of the students will also greatly increase – mainly because they wont be using the university system as a back door to permanent residency in Australia.

Cailen.

Update – June 1, 2009: Worried parents call student back from Aus

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Worried-parents-call-student-back-from-Aus/articleshow/4601485.cms

GURGAON/NEW DELHI: Last September, 19-year-old Mukul Khanna had gone to Macquarie University, Sydney, all excited about finishing his BBA there and then probably settling in Australia. Less than a year later, he has returned to his Gurgaon home, called back by parents who hit the panic button after a friend of his was bashed up in Sydney two weeks back.

Sitting in his DLF Phase-V home, Dinesh Khanna, Mukul’s hotelier father tells TOI: “I know my son will now have to drop a year because he won’t get admission anywhere. But I am relieved that he is away from that madness.”

Mukul though says that fear among the Indian student population in Sydney, Melbourne and other cities is on the rise. “They target all Asian students including Pakistani and Sri Lankans. A lot of my Pakistani friends have left the place after being brutally attacked and robbed. Interestingly, the attackers are mostly not locals and are themselves people of foreign origin who resent the fact that Indian students go there in large numbers and take up jobs which may otherwise have gone to them.”

Print Friendly Page

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,25309064-29277,00.html?from=public_rss

http://mosman-daily.whereilive.com.au/news/story/the-chapel-without-a-crucifix

CRUCIFIXES, Bibles and all other Christian symbols have been banned from a hospital’s chapel when it is not being used for a church service.

The Mosman Daily has learnt that Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney has bes been ordered to remove Christian content by New South Wales bureaucrats to avoid offending Muslims, Hindus or other non-Christian believers who may want to pray in the chapel.

Hospital staff say that while the chapel was built for Christians, they now want the chapel to be completely non-denominational.

An inspection of the chapel last week by the Daily found no trace of a crucifix or any other religious symbol inside the chapel.

The Daily has been told that church leaders must bring their own symbols to use in a service.

The chapel building also contains a separate Muslim prayer room. [more ...]

The first is that I recognise that to the Christians, their chapel was holy ground. It’s only Muslim and Jewish influences that have caused the New South Wales state government to order the removal of Christian icons from the hospital chapel. Really, if these people with their primitive religions don’t like this country, they can go back to whence they came. But then, with their standard belief of “Love thy enemy,” and Christians not having the balls to take back what is rightfully theirs, they get what they deserve.

On the other hand, never being a Christian, I’d say bulldoze the place. It’s a waste of space. Hospitals are places of science. If you want to go talk to your imaginary friends, go to the psychiatric ward where you’ll find more of your kind.

To Creators reading this. If you are ever in Mosman hospital for a period of time, take the time to give a serman or two from the White Man’s Bible. If they refuse to permit reading from our holy books, sue the bastards!

Cailen.

Print Friendly Page

Susie O’Brien: Herald Sun | December 09, 2008

DISCRIMINATION against dominant white males will soon be encouraged in a bid to boost the status of women, the disabled and cultural and religious minorities.

Such positive discrimination — treating people differently in order to obtain equality for marginalised groups – is set to be legalised under planned changes to the Equal Opportunity Act foreshadowed last week by state Attorney-General Rob Hulls.

The laws are also expected to protect the rights of people with criminal records to get a job, as long as their past misdeeds are irrelevant to work being sought.

Equal Opportunity Commission CEO Dr Helen Szoke said males had “been the big success story in business and goods and services”.

“Clearly, they will have their position changed because they will be competing in a different way with these people who have been traditionally marginalised,” she said.

“Let’s open it up so everyone can have a fair go.”

Victoria’s peak business body expressed concern yesterday about the need for the proposed laws, and questioned if they would undermine the right of companies to make legitimate business decisions.

At present, individuals or bodies wanting to single out any race or gender for special treatment must gain an exemption from VCAT. [more ...]

If they change the laws allowing employers to discriminate against White males, they had better change assault laws too because I will spit in the employer’s face when he or she discriminates against me. If anyone thinks I wouldn’t, I did the same 25 years ago when refused a job because I was not Vietnamese. These days I would pursue my rights under current legislation – but if those rights were to be taken from me, spitting in the face of a discriminating employer would become an option again.

Since this is my own blog, let me go further on this and clarify a few things. Spitting in the face of an anti-White racist employer would only be a start. A smack in the teeth is the logical escalation of violent tactics that would ensue culminating in arson and the eventual murder of White hating, racist employers and government officials.

The average White Australian male is very sensitive when it comes to his own personal wants and needs, and employment in a “fair go” environment is at the very centre of everything he strives for. The removal of equal opportunity employment in favour of sexual and racial minority agendas strikes at his very core, and he will not tolerate it.

If this law comes to pass in Victoria (and elsewhere), you can be your balls there will be violence – and it’s your balls that will be on the line.

That is what we Creators call RAHOWA!

Cailen Cambeul of Oaklands Park.

Print Friendly Page